- + New Debate
- Debate News
- About
- Debra AI More
frame
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Communities
- 8.3K All Communities
- 254 Technology
- 1.9K Politics
- 676 United States
- 592 Global
- 65 Immigration
- 1.9K Religion
- 230 TV SHOWS
- 60 Movies
- 79 History
- 44 Work Place
- 475 Philosophy
- 411 Science
- 62 Earth Science
- 9 Books
- 101 Economy
- 34 Investments
- 14 Europe
- 10 Tea
- 7 Coffee
- 59 Sports
- 42 Products
- 283 News
- 13 Airplanes
- 33 Cars
- 851 General
- 9 Mafia Games
- 24 Art And Design
- 20 Space
- 50 Military
- 3 Premium Member
DEBATE NEWS BREAKING NEWS
Tire toxicity faces fresh scrutiny after salmon die-offs
Tires emit huge volumes of particles and chemicals as they roll along the highway, and researchers are only beginning to understand the threat. One byproduct of tire use, 6PPD-q, is in regulators' crosshairs after it was found to be killing...
Campaigning with divisive platforms?
Debate Information
Is it fair, and equal, or unfair and unequal, for a U.S. citizen, who's seeking a political office, to become a political representative, by campaigning to the public as a whole, with some of these individual talking points, as a part of their individual platforms?
Utilizing the "race card?"
(Does this card, benefit the country, as a whole, or does it maybe benefit, certain cultures, over the other cultures? In other words, it's a probable "Exclusivity" card?)
Utilizing the "legalization of Recreational Marijuana card?"
(Does this card, benefit the country, as a whole, or does it maybe benefit, exclusively, the recreational marijuana user's, over the rest of the country, as a whole?)
Utilizing the "Immigrantion card?"
(Examples, being pro illegal immigrant, or alien, being pro Sanctuary City oriented, or being pro "border security," while being, anti Border barrier, or Wall, at the same time?)
(Does this card, benefit the country as a whole, or does it maybe benefit, exclusively, the 11-22 million illegal immigrants, or aliens, who are currently in the United States illegally, and are being used by the various businesses under the table, for the cheap labor?
While being given sanctuary, by one of the 300 Sanctuary Cities, in the U.S.?
Is this practice, fair or unfair, to the rest of the legal citizens, who live in those same sanctuary cities?)
So when an individual is expressing some of the above talking points, as a part of their campaign platform, are they being fair and equal, to the country, as a whole, or are they being fair and equal, only towards their individual supporter, or constituent, fanbases?
Because, up to this point, we've gotten to witness two Democratic Debates, and some of their campaign talking points, have already been placed on the "public, as a whole" table.
And I'm curious to see, via the Republican Debates, what their campaign talking points, will be comprised of, and what cards, that they may place, on the "public, as a whole, table as well?
Utilizing the "race card?"
(Does this card, benefit the country, as a whole, or does it maybe benefit, certain cultures, over the other cultures? In other words, it's a probable "Exclusivity" card?)
Utilizing the "legalization of Recreational Marijuana card?"
(Does this card, benefit the country, as a whole, or does it maybe benefit, exclusively, the recreational marijuana user's, over the rest of the country, as a whole?)
Utilizing the "Immigrantion card?"
(Examples, being pro illegal immigrant, or alien, being pro Sanctuary City oriented, or being pro "border security," while being, anti Border barrier, or Wall, at the same time?)
(Does this card, benefit the country as a whole, or does it maybe benefit, exclusively, the 11-22 million illegal immigrants, or aliens, who are currently in the United States illegally, and are being used by the various businesses under the table, for the cheap labor?
While being given sanctuary, by one of the 300 Sanctuary Cities, in the U.S.?
Is this practice, fair or unfair, to the rest of the legal citizens, who live in those same sanctuary cities?)
So when an individual is expressing some of the above talking points, as a part of their campaign platform, are they being fair and equal, to the country, as a whole, or are they being fair and equal, only towards their individual supporter, or constituent, fanbases?
Because, up to this point, we've gotten to witness two Democratic Debates, and some of their campaign talking points, have already been placed on the "public, as a whole" table.
And I'm curious to see, via the Republican Debates, what their campaign talking points, will be comprised of, and what cards, that they may place, on the "public, as a whole, table as well?
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments