At some point in the distant past, the universe went through a phase of cosmic inflation,
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
- + New Debate
- Debate News
- About
- Debra AI More
frame
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Communities
- 8.3K All Communities
- 254 Technology
- 1.9K Politics
- 676 United States
- 592 Global
- 65 Immigration
- 1.9K Religion
- 230 TV SHOWS
- 60 Movies
- 78 History
- 44 Work Place
- 475 Philosophy
- 411 Science
- 62 Earth Science
- 9 Books
- 101 Economy
- 34 Investments
- 14 Europe
- 10 Tea
- 7 Coffee
- 59 Sports
- 42 Products
- 283 News
- 13 Airplanes
- 33 Cars
- 851 General
- 9 Mafia Games
- 24 Art And Design
- 20 Space
- 50 Military
- 3 Premium Member
DEBATE NEWS BREAKING NEWS
10-year-old boy can't be charged for homicide he says he committed 2 years ago
Texas state law says a child under the age of 10 doesn't have criminal culpability, law enforcement...
In this Debate
Future Presidents
Debate Information
It doesn't matter if you are a supporter of Trump or one of his numerous detractors, he will be out of office eventually.
Trump's Lawyers have argued in the Senate trial that the president has the authority to do whatever s/he wants based on the constitution. If we are to assume that this is the case in support of Trump, then what will this mean that future presidents can do? If it is acceptable for presidents to do whatever they please, then we do not live in a Republic but rather a dictatorship. A future president will be able to take advantage of this for increased power and authority, and in time this will enable greater power perpetuating the cycle.
Much of the Trump campaign was based on "draining the swam" the idea that many career politicians have to much power, which latter evolved into into including bureaucrats, federal offices and private media. However what is oft missed by those who support the degradation of such institutions, is that the solution is not to dissolve the power of these institutions, but rather to concentrate them under the control of the president.
It is for this reason that I question the true motives of those who seek not to condemn such actions by allowing abuses of power by the Executive branch. This is of course coming after a string of authoritarian presidents, dramatically escalating with the 911 attacks and continuing for the next two decades. If we continue on this downward spiral, then we will lose much more of our freedoms and rights that we already have lost. A future individual who lacks the moral character and has the resources and capabilities to allow such abuses will serve as a blatant destruction of the US and everything it has stood for.
Trump's Lawyers have argued in the Senate trial that the president has the authority to do whatever s/he wants based on the constitution. If we are to assume that this is the case in support of Trump, then what will this mean that future presidents can do? If it is acceptable for presidents to do whatever they please, then we do not live in a Republic but rather a dictatorship. A future president will be able to take advantage of this for increased power and authority, and in time this will enable greater power perpetuating the cycle.
Much of the Trump campaign was based on "draining the swam" the idea that many career politicians have to much power, which latter evolved into into including bureaucrats, federal offices and private media. However what is oft missed by those who support the degradation of such institutions, is that the solution is not to dissolve the power of these institutions, but rather to concentrate them under the control of the president.
It is for this reason that I question the true motives of those who seek not to condemn such actions by allowing abuses of power by the Executive branch. This is of course coming after a string of authoritarian presidents, dramatically escalating with the 911 attacks and continuing for the next two decades. If we continue on this downward spiral, then we will lose much more of our freedoms and rights that we already have lost. A future individual who lacks the moral character and has the resources and capabilities to allow such abuses will serve as a blatant destruction of the US and everything it has stood for.
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
Executive officer Trump Versus President Trump.
Any argument based on United State Constitution on Presidential powers would rely greatly on council’s ability to provide admissible evidence on behalf of the Executive officers abilities in the maintaining of all men set in united state before constitution.
The first of many obligations before the supreme court by council would be to establish how all woman are created equal by allowing perjury. Though many lies are hard to prove in court it does not make the misinformation created on an official state legal.
Second of many obligations before the supreme court for council would be to establish how all woman are not created equal by the creation of a woman sitting for the future of all men, instead of Presadera without prejudice.
What a President has been interpreted to be and what a President of United State is by legal authority are two different ideas of right and are clearly not in a united state. A lawyer does not have the right to present a man before the Congress of the United States of American and insist he is everyone who defends United States Constitution in American must see him as their president.
There are two things as United State which had changed the direction of united state of constitution in America.
1. It no longer became the burden of all men to be create equal to other men by their creator.
2. It never was the burden of all woman to be created equal before their creator.
What United State does to Constitution is this matter is describes Congress had a obligation to united executive officer and congress man in BiniVir and Impeach both as a united state.
Considerate: 85%
Substantial: 93%
Spelling & Grammar: 93%
Sentiment: Positive
Avg. Grade Level: 11.82
Sources: 0
Entity Sentiment Detection: first of many obligations council’s ability Executive officer Trump United State Constitution
Relevant (Beta): 82%
Learn More About Debra