Believing in God is voluntary.

@CYDdharta

Just as much as you love and cherish your guns, and the right to bear them, the victims who were killed by gun violence, I can only imagine, that they as well, loved and cherished their individual lives, and the lives that each and everyone of them were living, they don't get to enjoy their lives, like you're doing, do they?

Because someone with a gun, or a collection of guns, committed a gun violence crime, and took their lives away from them?

And those lost lives deserve to have whoever wants to fight and defend their lost lives by protesting gun violence.

When I went to the March for our lives rally, it was awing, to see the kids who survived a offenders gun violence crimes, protesting gun violence, and to see those same survivors, fighting for others by protesting gun violence.

So just like you, protesting anything that apparently doesn't go along with your individual pro gun points of view, and how things, other than guns can kill people, might be used as a pro gun narrative counter talking point, you can create a protest to protect your guns, while others are protesting gun violence crimes, and defending those kids who lost their lives to the offenders with their guns?

Which is the bigger right?

The right to bear arms?

Or the right to live and enjoy ones life, without it being infringed upon, by someone committing an illegal gun violence crime, against someone?

Which is the bigger right?

@CYDdharta

Can a monster truck, a sports car, or a crotch rocket, legitimately shoot and kill innocent people?

Let's see, what other things that aren't legitimately a gun, can legitimately hurt people, CYDdharta?

@CYDdharta

"Of course it does.  If the "assault" weapons ban passes, when it fails as it is destined to, then the ban will be expanded, maybe to handguns, maybe "sniper" rifles.  And when that fails to stop all gun crime, it'll be expanded again, and again, and again until it covers all modern firearms and all ammo components."

Exactly what purpose does a citizen owning an assault rifle serve?

Exactly what purpose would a citizen owning a sniper rifle serve?

Making a guess, a 22 rifle, or a 38 revolver, as home or property protection, (would maybe get snubbed at) when someone can buy an assault rifle and or a Glock 17, in a neighborhood where families, live less than 50 yards from each other, when the homes aren't that far from each other?

The average assault rifle can fire how far, say 300 meters?

So if an assault rifle owner has a weapons malfunction, and the rounds from one neighbors property, travels from that assault rifle to another neighbors property, then what?

@CYDdharta

How about answering the following questions.

Instead of pushing your apparent (individual, one sided pro gun owner politics) then?

CYDdharta: Does the debate on gun control, pertain to your Individually owned guns, yes or no?

Has anyone ever come to your Individual residence, and instructed you to give your weapons up, because the ongoing debate over gun control, yes or no? 

Because if the likely or probable answer, is a (no) then I'm guessing that your weapons are fine, and they aren't going anywhere, right? 

Or does the debate on gun control, pertain mainly to the guns used by the criminals or the offenders who used their individual gun or guns to kill innocent people via mass shooting crimes, or other various crimes involving the illegal use of a gun or guns? 

The questions I have been asking, pertain to the offenders and criminals who used their guns to harm, maim, and kill innocent people with.