@ZeusAres42

"Do you support the Death Penalty, Euthanasia, etc? Or are you actually really pro-life at all?"

Are you here to bully people with your own spin on how you look at the pro Life conversation?



@ZeusAres42

Are trying to tell me, others how to think?

"@TKDB it really is quite simple. If you are against abortion because you support life then you cannot say that you support the death penalty as that is the very act of taking away a life also.  If you say you are pro life except in cases of the death penalty this is nothing more than a fallacy of special pleading. You're either pro Life which means support for all life or you're not."

Because an abortion, is no different from the Death Penalty, is it?

But here you are, trying to tell people, that their thinking is a fallacy, because they're not seeing things according to the words coming out of your own mouth right?

How does a fetus deserve to be aborted because two consensual adults were too lazy to use contraceptives, before being intimate?

Is an incarcerated prisoners life, more important than an unborn babies life is, ZeusAres42, because that question should be easy to answer right?

@ZeusAres42 ;
Rape is a fallacy, isn't it?
Sexual assault is a fallacy, isn't it?
Abortion is a fallacy, isn't it?

@ZeusAres42 ;
Are you pro incarcerated prisoner?

Are you pro Abortion?

Are you pro family, or are you pro criminal, and pro offender? 
(Because if you're pro criminal, and offender, then how can you be pro family at the same time?)


@ZeusAres42

Because if you're pro incarcerated prisoner, and pro criminal, and pro offender, while being pro Abortion at the same time, then the rhetoric that you've been shoveling in my direction, makes sense. 

@Dee

@xlJ_dolphin_473

@AlofRI

@Plaffelvohfen

@DustinPfeifer

https://evolution-institute.org/darwin-wallace-evolution-and-atheism/

@MayCaesar

Fact, or Fictional roleplay?
The killing of a fetus, via abortion millions and millions of times over, is the TRUE definition in regards to your bias Atheist wordplay, over the word "Atrocities?"

Fact, or Fictional roleplay?
Those kids, who have killed kids via their mass shooters crimes, over the years, is another TRUE definition of the word Atrocities?

Fact, or Fictional roleplay?
Some of those Liberal lawmakers in the United States, who maybe created their 300 Sanctuary Cities, to give the illegal immigrants Sanctuary in a country based on law's, is another example of what Liberal Atrocity crafted lawmaking maybe looks like?

Fact, or Fictional roleplay?
Are you maybe suggesting that the Atheist mindset, is the most humane mindset, that humanity should adopt, because your Atheist mindset, is maybe the best thing for all the children in the world, that haven't been killed via an abortion?

Fact, or Fictional roleplay?
Should Adoption maybe be outlawed, according to the Atheist mindset?

Fact, or Fictional roleplay?
Will the Atheist mindset, be able as we speak, to keep any illegal immigrant, from killing, sexually assaulting,  or victimizing the millions of legal US citizens, who live with those criminal illegal immigrants in those same Sanctuary Cities, who are illegally lurking around them via their illegal sanctuary city enabled privileges, because of being given sanctuary, in a country based on Law's?


@MayCaesar


"I have plenty of religious friends, and their religious views have never been an issue for me. I do not mind religion; I simply see it as a roleplay adults partake in."

Nonetheless, countless atrocities have been committed in the name of religion, while no atrocity I know of has been committed in the name of atheism. Stating facts is not being anti-religious, it is being truthful."

I don't play mind games with role play, or fiction, when actual facts can carry their own factual weight based on Real Life facts.

@MayCaesar

Your anti religious tone is passively blatant:

"I also do not have conflicts on the Internet. I have discussions."

"But even if I did, they would still not result in people impaled on a central plaza, so we are good here."

You're another anti religious individual, expressing your anti religious tone, at your leisure.

@SkepticalOne

All you've done is educate me on your Theist Privileges and Rights.

"I've answered many, many questions for you. I've been very patient and charitable in my attempts to address these questions. It seems you don't understand my responses. I don't see that changing. So, I'll bid you adieu for now."

No you haven't, you've toyed with most of the questions, and used them as a platform for your Theist views?


And I stand by my points:

@SkepticalOne, Do you know what "Privilege" that you've unintentionally educated me on?

The use of Atheist privilege, and Theist privilege:

(Because the Atheists, and the Theists used the SCOTUS, to in a sense to deprive, the Religious individuals in the United States, from the Right to say a harmless prayer anywhere they choose to, as the behest of the Atheists, and Theists groups in the U.S., and that's the factual TRUTH, since 1962.)

The same claim that you made about Religion and the use of the United States Government? ( Exactly how legitimate is that theory of yours?)


Because in reality, in 1962, the Atheists, and the Theists, used the SCOTUS, in the same way, that you were theorizing about? 

And the answer is yes, that's exactly what happened.


And here is your Theist platform point:

"It's no surprise you're against a separation of church and state."

(Your premier point: Better hope opposing sects of Christianity in such a privileged position never use the power of government to advance their religious views at the expense of your own." )

"If you had ever been a religious minority, you would understand clearly the danger of mixing religion and government."


@SkepticalOne

The evidence is clear on what has occurred historically, versus theoretically.