DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Exploring space leads to discovers that can help us advance in science and protect are selves. Plus we may be able to start exploiting resources in space. We are surrounded by space so it is in my onion important. (I am very besides sense that is what I wan't my job to be when a grow up)
I am no longer active on DebateIsland or any debate website. Many things I have posted here and on other sites (Such as believing in the flat Earth theory or other conspiracy theories such as those that are about the Las Vegas Shooting or 9/11) do not reflect on my current views.
I think such fields as nanotechnology, artificial intelligence and genetic engineering are much more promising and practical in the foreseeable future in terms of investment returns, than space programs. Historically space programs started as a manifestation of the economical war between Soviet Union and the US - and while at some point they became pretty sustainable without taking up a significant portion of the governmental budget, their return is still extremely low.
I simply do not see space programs achieving any sort of breakthrough in terms of humanity's quality of life in the next 50-60 years. On the other hand, nanotechnology may revolutionize production, artificial intelligence does not need introduction, and genetic engineering is about the best investment we can make into the future, because it can literally grant us immortality within our younger members' lifetime.
I would leave space programs to enthusiasts such as Elon Musk, and funnel governmental funds into more promising projects.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 73%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 98%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
exist
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p6M-VgXHwwdpJarhyQYapBz-kRc6FrgdOLFAd3IfYz8/edit
https://debateisland.com/discussion/comment/18248/#Comment_18248 (Me officially stating that I am no longer a flat-Earther)
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 0%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 62%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
I simply do not see space programs achieving any sort of breakthrough in terms of humanity's quality of life in the next 50-60 years. On the other hand, nanotechnology may revolutionize production, artificial intelligence does not need introduction, and genetic engineering is about the best investment we can make into the future, because it can literally grant us immortality within our younger members' lifetime.
I would leave space programs to enthusiasts such as Elon Musk, and funnel governmental funds into more promising projects.
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra