DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
In the end, in the old true way of leadership, everyone worshipped the king and not the queen. The queen was to be loved, adored and the woman everyone would f*** the hell out of if they could get away with it.
Then times changed. Even the females were less happy because men treated them less like things to be adored and more like equals and women hate being masculine.
That being said, if a female is quite masculine minded they do make great leaders and if a male is quite feminine minded they make great nurses and house-husbands so it's also about the spectrum.
I support sexism but I support a spectrum.
Women are the gel of society, men are the thing that gives the gel purpose.
@natbarons It is not an anti-male agenda. It supports equality of women with men.
I could either have the future pass me or l could create it.
“We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain .” - Benjamin Franklin So flat Earthers, man-made climate change deniers, and just science deniers.
Like most things in this world, feminism began with a clear purpose and a good one at that, but then ignorance and stupidity come into the equation. A lot of women have taken feminism to extremes, this because women who hate men call themselves feminist, when in reality they are not, they just say they are without even believing in the cause at all. It also suddenly became a trend and again, people who don't know and don't believe in the real cause call themselves feminists and begin to act in name of the cause. People have manipulated and corrupted feminism and now it has in a way become a joke.
We see feminists in the streets attacking men, even men who fight for the same cause, because they have warped view of what feminism is. Feminist fight for equity or equality, not against men. They used to fight for women to be taken seriously and to be given the value and the voice that we deserve. It's a disappointment that the original cause feminists fought for has now been lost because of ignorance.
It's true that women do receive advantages in terms of how they are sentenced, but that argument falls short for me because:
1) It is an argument which only applies to a small fraction of individuals (criminals) and doesn't apply to the vast majority of people.
2) It ignores the fact that feminists are after equality and therefore this is a difference they are looking to eradicate too
3) It is an argument I have seen dozens of times, but only ever in the context of an excuse to ignore discrimination against women. I have never once seen anyone making this point bring up societal and prison reforms to help address this balance, only ever referencing the issue as a stick to beat feminists with.
@Ampersand my case is that women actually dig dominance in men and men dig women appreciating their dominance.
By men I mean masculine people and vice versa, I don't mean born with the xy or xx genitalia alone.
Thus, feminism is seeking equality but feminine people are attracted to those higher up in inequality and masculine people thrive when they are the top of that food chain.
In other words, equality makes women less attracted to men and makes men feel less manly.
I'm really staggered by this but I actually agree with @someone234. I don't think for a second that Women actually want to be equal to Men for the most part. Granted Women might want some of the same things and they might want to equalize certain aspects of society to a higher degree of fairness...but I don't think they truly want it all to be equal.
I don't really have time to explain the rationale for this but I'll come back to it later.
I would like to say that I am completely okay with feminism. But I dont really agree with third wave feminists. Mostly because they push a more female in power instead of equality agenda. Again, I’m not saying I dont like feminism, I’m just saying i dont agree with the views of the third wave ones.
Not every quote you read on the internet is true- Abraham Lincoln
Feminism is just an idea that women, who historically have been given a secondary role in the society, should have the role changed to the one equal to that of men. This idea is hardly a joke, and even the most tyrannical societies in the world (barring a few Sharia ones which do not conform with the Western idea of human rights), at least, try to pretend that they share the idea of feminism.
However, as any other popular and politically powerful idea, it can be bent and twisted by various power groups to suit their agenda, which has little to do with feminism. One of the common manifestations of it is the "scientific field" called "feminist studies", which is a blatant pseudo-science and a way of a few powerful movements to establish a foothold on campuses around the world, where they can poison the youth with their ideas. There is no science in "feminist studies", it is a worthless field that does not produce any specialists qualified to work anywhere but serve the interests of those movements' leaders.
Many individuals also take on a banner of "feminism" to propagate and market their personal horrible ideas, that have nothing to do with the actual feminism.
But then, it all was pretty expected from the beginning. In the end, the vast majority of human rights activists are first and foremost concerned with their own rights. And when a human rights organization is tasked to defend the interests of a particular fraction of the population, rather than those of the entire population - then the selfishness of people is bound to result in advocacy for much more than just equality. This is just how the world works.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 39%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Then times changed. Even the females were less happy because men treated them less like things to be adored and more like equals and women hate being masculine.
That being said, if a female is quite masculine minded they do make great leaders and if a male is quite feminine minded they make great nurses and house-husbands so it's also about the spectrum.
I support sexism but I support a spectrum.
Women are the gel of society, men are the thing that gives the gel purpose.
  Considerate: 36%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 22%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.06  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra
It is not an anti-male agenda. It supports equality of women with men.
“We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain .” - Benjamin Franklin So flat Earthers, man-made climate change deniers, and just science deniers.
I friended myself!
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 33%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.76  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
We see feminists in the streets attacking men, even men who fight for the same cause, because they have warped view of what feminism is. Feminist fight for equity or equality, not against men. They used to fight for women to be taken seriously and to be given the value and the voice that we deserve. It's a disappointment that the original cause feminists fought for has now been lost because of ignorance.
  Considerate: 65%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
It's true that women do receive advantages in terms of how they are sentenced, but that argument falls short for me because:
1) It is an argument which only applies to a small fraction of individuals (criminals) and doesn't apply to the vast majority of people.
2) It ignores the fact that feminists are after equality and therefore this is a difference they are looking to eradicate too
3) It is an argument I have seen dozens of times, but only ever in the context of an excuse to ignore discrimination against women. I have never once seen anyone making this point bring up societal and prison reforms to help address this balance, only ever referencing the issue as a stick to beat feminists with.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
By men I mean masculine people and vice versa, I don't mean born with the xy or xx genitalia alone.
Thus, feminism is seeking equality but feminine people are attracted to those higher up in inequality and masculine people thrive when they are the top of that food chain.
In other words, equality makes women less attracted to men and makes men feel less manly.
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
I don't really have time to explain the rationale for this but I'll come back to it later.
someone234 said: So much this ^
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stup!d".
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_ucR-1NodAs
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 7%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.72  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
However, as any other popular and politically powerful idea, it can be bent and twisted by various power groups to suit their agenda, which has little to do with feminism. One of the common manifestations of it is the "scientific field" called "feminist studies", which is a blatant pseudo-science and a way of a few powerful movements to establish a foothold on campuses around the world, where they can poison the youth with their ideas. There is no science in "feminist studies", it is a worthless field that does not produce any specialists qualified to work anywhere but serve the interests of those movements' leaders.
Many individuals also take on a banner of "feminism" to propagate and market their personal horrible ideas, that have nothing to do with the actual feminism.
But then, it all was pretty expected from the beginning. In the end, the vast majority of human rights activists are first and foremost concerned with their own rights. And when a human rights organization is tasked to defend the interests of a particular fraction of the population, rather than those of the entire population - then the selfishness of people is bound to result in advocacy for much more than just equality. This is just how the world works.
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra