frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.





Is this acceptable?

Debate Information

Is it acceptable to eat a person if
1. The two well-informed people( the eater and the eaten) made a mutual consent to carry out cannibalism
2.Nobody will get inspired and imitate the cannibalism
3. Nobody will get upset about the cannibalism
?
Blastcat



Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted To Win
Tie

Details +




Post Argument Now Debate Details +

    Arguments


  • Happy_KillbotHappy_Killbot 5557 Pts   -  
    There is an interesting moral theory, that everything moral can be reduced to conformed consent. The primary detractors to this argument are that there may be reverberating consequences that can not be accounted for, and that perfect knowledge isn't possible. In this context, this would be a moral action because you have effectively nullified the detracting arguments.
    At some point in the distant past, the universe went through a phase of cosmic inflation,
    Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
    Through a long process of evolution this life 
    developed into the human race.
    Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .

    All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  • MayCaesarMayCaesar 6053 Pts   -  
    It might not be acceptable socially, but it should be acceptable legally. However twisted it may seem, if both people want it and their actions do not affect anyone else directly, then why should they be prevented from it?

    For the same reason, I think that consensual assisted suicide should be legal. If I ask someone to chop my head off with an axe and have a third party witness the mutually consensual contract, then the person should not be persecuted for doing so. I would like to not live in a society in which such arrangements are normalised, but I would like even less to live in a society where they are outlawed for some abstract moral reasons.
    smoothieBlastcat
  • DeeDee 5395 Pts   -  
    I think it’s perfectly acceptable once they’re both consenting and If it results in people getting upset or copying so what? 
    Blastcat
Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
© 2023 DebateIsland.com, all rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch