Why is it ok to discriminate against Conservatives applying for jobs? We have laws that prevent employers from even asking questions about a person's religion, race, sexual orientation, etc.
Why is it ok to deny a person a job based on their politcal persuasion? Big Corporations are joining forces to deny employment to people who worked in the Trump administration!
We have big corporations refusing to sell products, such as My Pillow, when the owners are Conservative Trump supporters.
We have TV sponsers denying sponsership to Conservative programming.
Why are those on the Left such hypocrites? Why is job discrimination perfectly ok if done against Conservatives? The double standards from people on the Left is truly nauseating and goes to show the cherry picked phony concerns they have in regards to non discrimination in the workforce.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
"Moderation" is a key word for acknowledging that nothing is ever black and white, that there are always shades of gray.
10% of Americans (~34 million) support asset seizure. About twice that number support the government allowing illegals to steal your property, as sanctuary cities have about 20% support. Roughly 70 million is not a number to just dismiss.
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yes we've experienced the consequences of the authoritarian Democrat Party's affirmative action, their so called non discrimination laws to protect only their special interest groups, the monopolies now being created in our corporations.
We on the Right hate it and only now have been forced to demand fairness against these monopolies.
What you are doing, AS ALWAYS, is giving the Left a pass and judging those on the Right for finally being forced to do what Democrats have been doing for decades.
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: consequences of the authoritarian Democrat Party    affirmative action   special interest groups   Right hate  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
You never answered me. Would you like our utility companies denying you electricity because of your political beliefs?
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 58%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: utility companies    political beliefs   electricity    
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
The right is the reason these companies exist and are allowed to do that in the first place, don't you get it? Privatization is the reason that these companies can do what they do, you did this.
The right protects the option of these companies to kick off whoever they want, whenever they want, for any reason they see fit. That isn't a violation of the 1st Amendment.
Seriously, can you explain what "right wing economics" is all about, or are you too propagandized to understand and articulate even that?
No $4!t Sherlock, by saying that companies should have restrictions: You are the "Authoritarian leftist" now aren't you?
If you don't want these tech monopolies to "censor" your speech, then you should support public infrastructure by refusing to vote for Republican candidates who actively sabotage it, don't believe me look at Texas right now...
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Justifiable homicide" is not murder, consensual sex is not rape by definition (and laws that classify it as such are self-contradictory), and someone not being charged for robbery does not make robbery legal.
Do you agree that murder, rape and robbery should sometimes be allowed?
Let us take it a step further: should robbery of your home sometimes be allowed? Not too often; let us say, once every 2 years? Better not be too far in one direction on this one!
Truth and false, logic and illogic, identity and contradiction - these are pretty black and white. Seeing shades of grey in them indicates to me lack of desire to think.
"Public platform" or not, Facebook is a private organization. If it enjoys some special protection and privileges due to its status, then it should have them revoked. And if there are restrictions put on what services it can or cannot agree or refuse to provide to consensual individuals, then those should be revoked too - and new ones should never be invoked.
A homeless shelter absolutely should be free to ban black people, or any other people that it chooses to. That would kind of go against the purpose of this shelter in the first place, but, hey, if it is privately owned, then it is up to its owners to decide who to let or not let in.
@We_are_accountable
I would not "like" it, but it is its right, assuming that it is privately-owned (and in my view, all companies should be privately-owned).
In the US most utility companies are nationalized or semi-nationalized. When that is the case, then the company should serve all taxpayers, so the argument does not apply. Again, I would love to see them all fully privatized, and then they are free not to serve me if they choose to do so.
I would hope, however, that in a civilized culture most companies would not be so petty as to deny someone service over their political views - for one, because politics would not play a major role in such society to begin with. Politics is seen as a big deal in the US because the government has its claws everywhere here. But if the government was properly restricted to several basic functions and did not stick its nose anywhere else, then my political views would not be of much interest to most people, as they would be pretty inconsequential, and then it is unlikely that many people would refuse to trade with me over it.
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 52%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well, to be moderate, I would have to say that you do have to serve dinner to them every now and then. Not too often, but not too rare either. Once every 2 years sounds reasonable.
But then, I do not want to be moderate; you do.
No, I do not think that existence of bad laws validates introducing more bad laws. This is the kind of logic that leads to the government growing uncontrollably. Better to have one bad law, than a gazillion bad laws trying to balance each other.
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: existence of bad laws    @CYDdharta Well   kind of logic   bad laws  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
A more perfect union can be filed grievance set against civil claims of prejudice.
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 42%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: perfect union    politics   grievance   civil claims of prejudice  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: existence of bad laws    valid reason   @CYDdharta Well   public establishment  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
No, in a proper free market system you would not. If it is your restaurant, then you can bar anyone from entrance. The restaurant is just a building, and the fact that you are conducting some business there does not change anything. You can open a restaurant for your friends at your own home right now and let no one else into your home, and you will be within your legal rights to do so. It should be no different for all types of food establishments.
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: own home    proper free market system   restaurant   legal rights  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
Do you have a point? I'm talking about reality.
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: own home    proper free market system   restaurant   legal rights  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
This is reality. This is how basic property rights work. That the government systematically violates them does not change the fact that they are there.
My point is that Facebook is no different than a restaurant or your home, and thus should not be treated differently by the law. The fact that Facebook has a lot of clients and huge revenue does not change anything. If you learn to make the best apple pie in the world and people from all over the world start coming to your home to eat it and pay you a lot of money for it, it still remains your home and your property, and it is up to you to decide who to let in and who to not, who to kick out and who to not.
My explanation is not very confusing, is it?
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: best apple pie    lot of clients   there.My point   world start  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: free market    best apple pie   there.My point   lot of clients  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra