DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Dirty limeys from the far East have no valid opinions on how things should be done in any Western countries, let alone the US!!!!! However you socialist europhiles think it should be done here is worthless
It would be nice if somebody could demonstrate how the Constitution gives a sitting President the right to commit murder, let alone violate any law before we all just go ahead and start acting like they can!! I've yet to see this so called authority of the President.
First piloteer I can and
have demonstrated it and the ability to do so in no way ensures you will
understand the cause the first one-hundred times a try to show you again. To be
clear though a sitting executive officer is no longer a President of the United
States of America, and we have the 19th Amendment and women to thank for that.
The point made by women was the process was deliberately done out of spite!
Though still legally very poor or inappropriate legislation.
Why? Women failed to hold a
constitution truth as united state and rewrite all the required Articles and
Section of American United States Constitution which made legislation
appropriate. The blind side of law in this case created by the blindfold over lady
justice is Presadera the act of Constitutional united state that secures all women
to a United State Constitutional Right claimed by women to be otherwise
impossible or not to existed as fact. As no women when left to their own accord
could not reach a state of the union perfectly describe her connection to all
other women without legal prejudice.
The original text of the Constitution and the emergency amendments are the only true legal objective principles on which to base authority and rights. Alcohol was once illegal, but that was never an objective legal principle. The question posed is which constitutional amendment within the original text of Constitution, or the bill of rights does a sitting President obtain the right to commit murder or right to violate any law? Legal "precedent" is not how an American should want to conduct politics. Constitutional principle is the only objective basis for political authority. "Legal-precedence" will have to be locked out of this meeting!!! This isn't europe.
The first question is
what is the difference between United States Constitutional Articles, Sections,
and Amendments as they are all written different and only addressed as equal? By
nothing less than legal malpractice under all applications of justice known.
The contest of American Constitution is not made on Right as
might it is made in the introduction of truth and fact as per introduction of
Preamble for the courts setting a right as inalienable truth. To focus of the
topic point at hand which is to say more presumptuous way without legal
prejudice is not called "murder" as it is connected to Executive
officer, President, or Presadera of Constitutional "Trust" as method
of service, preservation, and defense. The most pointe fact being neither male
or female ensures a person as having an ability to openly display and hold the
Trust by oath made on President or Presadera.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Dirty limeys from the far East have no valid opinions on how things should be done in any Western countries, let alone the US!!!!! However you socialist europhiles think it should be done here is worthless
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
It would be nice if somebody could demonstrate how the Constitution gives a sitting President the right to commit murder, let alone violate any law before we all just go ahead and start acting like they can!! I've yet to see this so called authority of the President.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
First piloteer I can and have demonstrated it and the ability to do so in no way ensures you will understand the cause the first one-hundred times a try to show you again. To be clear though a sitting executive officer is no longer a President of the United States of America, and we have the 19th Amendment and women to thank for that. The point made by women was the process was deliberately done out of spite! Though still legally very poor or inappropriate legislation.
Why? Women failed to hold a constitution truth as united state and rewrite all the required Articles and Section of American United States Constitution which made legislation appropriate. The blind side of law in this case created by the blindfold over lady justice is Presadera the act of Constitutional united state that secures all women to a United State Constitutional Right claimed by women to be otherwise impossible or not to existed as fact. As no women when left to their own accord could not reach a state of the union perfectly describe her connection to all other women without legal prejudice.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
The original text of the Constitution and the emergency amendments are the only true legal objective principles on which to base authority and rights. Alcohol was once illegal, but that was never an objective legal principle. The question posed is which constitutional amendment within the original text of Constitution, or the bill of rights does a sitting President obtain the right to commit murder or right to violate any law? Legal "precedent" is not how an American should want to conduct politics. Constitutional principle is the only objective basis for political authority. "Legal-precedence" will have to be locked out of this meeting!!! This isn't europe.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
The first question is what is the difference between United States Constitutional Articles, Sections, and Amendments as they are all written different and only addressed as equal? By nothing less than legal malpractice under all applications of justice known.
The contest of American Constitution is not made on Right as might it is made in the introduction of truth and fact as per introduction of Preamble for the courts setting a right as inalienable truth. To focus of the topic point at hand which is to say more presumptuous way without legal prejudice is not called "murder" as it is connected to Executive officer, President, or Presadera of Constitutional "Trust" as method of service, preservation, and defense. The most pointe fact being neither male or female ensures a person as having an ability to openly display and hold the Trust by oath made on President or Presadera.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra