Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
Lol. What? Did you fall and bump your head?
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I am inebriated at the moment, and bored. I did just get muted on a discord server for calling someone a faggot. Did not mean any detriment to gays though.
  Considerate: 43%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Lmao. I think you should remain inebriated indefinitely. You're a lot more more fun.
  Considerate: 49%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
thanks. i do think i am gonna pay for this tomorrow though!
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Best cure is to sleep through it buddy.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 21%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 74%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well at least I court mr big boy bully boss man out in the corner because he refuses to answer the damning questions so that also makes him a dishonest also.
Because he said and I quote I don't avoid questions. Did you notice how the explosion on the bottom of the building was super imposed and no body actually said there was a bomb in the building. Even mr boss man refuses to stand by the total dum and fake evidence he posted so it shows that he has as much substance in him as flea p.
  Considerate: 50%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.18  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
I don't trust the US government but there is no way our government could get away with killing 3000 of its own residents. Yes, the government has engaged in actual conspiracies[1], but this is too much. Also, there were jihadists in each plane, and it was Bin Laden who committed it. Also, the twin towers were an important American symbol back then, this would be like if the federal government conspired to destroy the Statue of Liberty by hijacking planes.
1.
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 58%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.4  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 70%  
  Learn More About Debra
"I don't believe it therefore it couldn't happen" isn't a valid form of argument. You're talking about the same government which got away with an illegal war in Iraq, in which thousands of Americans died, after repeatedly lying to the American people about everything from WMDs to non-existent links between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein. Your government very much could get away with killing thousands of its own citizens, and the blind refusal of Americans to believe that is why the victims will never have justice.
You guys live inside the biggest bubble of childlike naivety imaginable, where someone can lead you to absolute proof that your government lied continuously, and you still refuse to believe it.
Your government told you that!!! You're literally repeating the same horse crap your government told you and using it as an argument that the government told you the truth. It's the very definition of circular reasoning. There's no evidence whatsoever that bin Laden was involved. Zero.
This is what bin Laden said when he was asked whether he was involved:-
I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle.
https://www.serendipity.li/wot/obl_int.htm
Bin Laden offered to voluntarily surrender to house arrest in Pakistan and stand trial for the attacks. Does that sound like something a guilty man would do? Bush ignored him and invaded Afghanistan!! Your government lied about everything. It lied about everything and it exploited the media to print its version of events. It furthermore ruined the career of anybody who challenged that version of events.
To date, there has only ever been one single conviction in relation to the 9/11 attacks, Zacarias Moussaoui, and he took the stand in federal court and claimed to have proof that the US government knew about the attacks and let them happen!! Only guess what?? Surprise, surprise, the judge refused to let him submit it to the jury.
I find it nothing short of reprehensible that people who believe climate change is a hoax or that Democrats are running a secret child sex trafficking ring from the basement of a pizzeria (without a basement), somehow cannot be convinced that the government lied to them about what happened on 9/11, despite a veritable smorgasbord of evidence suggesting that it did exactly that.
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.12  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
Fortunately, I think you will find that there are not too many unsavory characters in this world who are so arrogant that they will only listen to the anarchistic voices spinning around their heads and nothing else. You have to realise that they are extremists and no doubt had extreme upbringings and take out their frustrations in trying to control and bully others through patronising abuse. Of course you beat him into a corner (which doesn't take much given the absurdity of the argument and the cringingly fake evidence) and of course he will never actually "state" anything or answer any questions that dare question his master's authority and he knows it which is why of course, he walked away since such people will go on to hunt down easier prey to manipulate.
The best thing is to just ignore these Adolf wannabes instead of provoking them since, like a piece of dog excrement lying in the gutter, they will eventually dry up and blow away with all the rest of the unwanted filth, never to be heard of again and nobody could even give a toss.
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
That's some fantastic Freudian projection there, buddy. If you scroll upwards through this thread you'll find a multitude of sources supporting my arguments, but of course you'll never do that because you're too arrogant to read anything which interferes with your delicate preconceptions about the world. It's much easier to avoid my arguments entirely and write a full paragraph worth of personal attacks, while staggeringly accusing me of arrogance. That way you can avoid the embarrassment of being schooled about the actual topic, and make yourself feel superior by putting me down in the traditional manner employed by all intellectual cowards.
You know, I've read probably a dozen or so of your posts, and I've never once stumbled across an actual argument. You confine yourself to thinly veiled insults, snarky sniping and belittling other people because you're an unintelligent person with nothing constructive to actually say.
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
And quite rightly so. You made not one argument and even if you did, the "multitude of sources" are all completely extremist, fake stu-pidity. You are a supreme anarchistic, , nut case if you ever think that anyone with half a brain is going to believe your lunacy. And I certainly am no "buddy" of a dill-brained, extremist half-wit such as you. You are a pathetic joke.
  Considerate: 29%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
And quite rightly so. You may have convinced yourself of your "evidence" which I did read but to any sane person it is cringingly crude, contrived nonsense.
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 67%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
First anarchist100 by saying inside job you are not including by excluding the Federal Government, maybe even the state government as well....
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
No you didn't. On top of all your other personality disorders you're also a brazen deceiver. If you'd read the evidence and believed it to be "contrived", then you were free to criticise it and we could have debated. Instead, you came into the thread and launched straight into a full paragraph of purposefully offensive personal remarks which you didn't even have the courage to address me with directly, just like the spineless coward we both know you are. You have nothing to offer this site except hate. Pathetic little toad that you are.
  Considerate: 52%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Oh, ABC News is "completely extremist", is it? The FEMA metallurgy report is "completely extremist"? Award-winning political scientist Nafeez Ahmed is "completely extremist"? Zip your mouth you absolute waste of carbon.
  Considerate: 36%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
No, Colbett is and he and his extremist cohorts doctored every one of the videos as you and a three year old child can clearly see. You can try as much as you like to put words in my mouth but extreme, conspiratorial views are what they are; totally blinkered, contrived and 100% wrong...there is not the slightest amount of evidence to come near suggesting what you want others to believe and linking a series of interviews out of context proves nothing and is an insult to decent intelligence.
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Duplicate
  Considerate: 98%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
To:-
Except no he isn't, and you're too thick to even spell his name correctly. None of the videos I have linked are doctored and you're not even worth responding to because you're an intellectually redundant, whining halfwit with nothing relevant to offer a conversation. Literally everything you write is false and 90 percent of it contradicts something else you've said previously. If pointless imbeciles had an international soccer team, you'd be the captain.
  Considerate: 54%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://www.911research.wtc7.net/faq/demolition.html
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.34  
  Sources: 6  
  Relevant (Beta): 17%  
  Learn More About Debra
WTC Building 7 Could NOT Have Collapsed Due To Small Fires According to University Study
The study concluded:
“The findings thus far are that fire did not bring down this building. Building failure simulations show that, to match observation, the entire inner core of this building failed nearly simultaneously,” the website for the study noted.
https://consciouslifenews.com/wtc-building-7-not-collapsed-due-small-fires-according-university-study-govt-story-false/11142456/
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.76  
  Sources: 5  
  Relevant (Beta): 35%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.38  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.22  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.58  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 28%  
  Learn More About Debra
Comparing Qanon, which is a series of completely baseless claims made by an unknown troll, and which lack even an iota of evidential support, with the multitude of professionals and academics who are adamant the 9/11 official story is a farce, and who have a treasure trove of evidence to support their case, is about as absurd as it's possible to get.
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
I don't know what this even means, but it sounds like you're saying we should walk through life in ignorance and be happy about it.
Snopes are experts in literally nothing.
I read through this link. As I expected, it's a series of straw man arguments which spectacularly avoids addressing any of the actual reasons people question the official narrative. I've personally been researching 9/11 for over 15 years and the only one on this "top ten" list I've even heard about is the last one.
Where does this article address the molten steel at Ground Zero which was reported by more than a dozen different sources?
Where does it address the litany of physicists, architects, engineers and demolitions experts who say the building collapses were the work of explosives?
Where does it address Professor Harrit's chemical analysis of the WTC dust?
Where does it address the dozens of eye-witnesses who claim there were bombs in the buildings?
Where does it address the fact that no government agency ever tested for any type of explosives residue?
Where does it address the "very unusual" (Professor Barnett) condition of the WTC steel?
Where does it address the complete absence of evidence bin Laden was in any way involved in the attacks?
Where does it address the 5 Mossad agents arrested for celebrating and filming the attacks?
Where does it address the explosives residue identified in the van of said Mossad agents?
Where does it address the symmetry of collapse? Where does it address the perimeter of 47 core steel supports which would have had to all fail simultaneously in order to result in a symmetrical collapse?
Where does it address the free fall speed of the collapse of WTC 7?
Where does it address the 682 other hijackings in the last 30 years which the air force has managed to intercept?
Where does it address the complete lack of air force support on that particular day?
Where does it address Cheney's strange comments to Norman Mineta as Flight 77 was being tracked approaching the Pentagon?
Where does it address the various media reports which show the government released the wrong identities of the supposed hijackers?
Where does it address the 15 "incomplete" and "incomprehensible" visa application forms handed in by the alleged hijackers and why, despite these, they were all given visas?
Where does it address the fact that the laws of physics themselves would have to be wrong in order for the collapses to have happened the way the government claimed?
Where does it address the fact that bin Laden's family was flown out of the country on the orders of George W Bush?
Where does it address the fact that bin Laden volunteered to stand trial and clear his own name?
Where does it address Mohammed Atta's magic passport, which supposedly flew out of a burning plane and landed on the ground completely intact?
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.6  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 40%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.54  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 48%  
  Learn More About Debra
We certainly agree on that. What we don't agree on is you using it as a reason to reject everything else someone in government has labelled a conspiracy theory.
You are being manipulated by pseudo-language. The term "conspiracy theory" is a pejorative and, as such, when it is used as a label to describe anything, it functions as a form of propaganda to dissuade the public from taking it seriously enough to actually find out if it's true. It works as a derivative of "the emperor has no clothes" fallacy. In the specific instance of 9/11, the public has been conned so enormously that it believes questioning an impossible conspiracy of foreign Jihadis who, armed with nothing but boxcutters, killed over 3,000 people and collapsed three buildings into dust, makes a person a conspiracy theorist! Somehow, the average person has been persuaded to believe that the exact opposite of the truth is true.
Your mistake is to blindly assume that people in authority, many of whom identify as -- or might even be -- experts, never have any other motive than telling the public the complete unbridled truth.
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.78  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
I think that perhaps you may need to just slow down a bit, take a few deep breaths and stop throwing your Ritalin in the pot plants; there is a reason why they're giving it to you and it will make you better. At best, since you are so keen to let others know what you think you could at least reciprocate and extend the courtesy to listen to what others have to say. The facts are Corbett is an extremist and a self-confessed anarchist, so is Robert Rodriguez, the videos are heavily doctored and the websites you provided links to are very amateurish, sensationalist and extreme, therefore they are all very wrong. Jumping up and down like an excited little girl and repeating over and over that they are true will not ever change those facts. The evidence has been presented to you by everyone else on this thread and if you choose to poo poo it, ridicule and belittle others, that's your business but it still will not change the facts either. The likes of Corbett make plenty of money by promulgating bizarre conspiracy theories because they know they have a ready market of goggle-eyed nit-wits out there who love getting sucked in by all that crap so they can shove up the authorities.
I have done some research however and found out a few things that may interest you. Did you know that there is a website that has listed (among others) your DebateIsland Avatar profile with your real name and comments beside it and that it is monitored by a government agency?
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
If you can give me the name of the person who suggested that anybody in the world cares what you think, I'll make sure they are reprimanded appropriately and retrained. They've clearly misled you, and I apologise for that.
No, the fact is that you are a moron. I'm afraid it's a lifelong condition caused by not having sufficient intelligence to comprehend that there's a problem with your intelligence. You're not alone, so don't worry. There are plenty of others who suffer from this same problem, although you do appear to be in the advanced stages. Does your tongue often slip out of your mouth and hang loosely when you are talking to people? Have you noticed a preponderance of saliva on the ground when you stand still in the same position for extended periods? Do people frequently raise their eyebrows when you say things to them?
On a more serious note, nobody is interested in you because you are a pointless troll who comes here only to antagonise other people. Your last debate had literally zero participants. Zero. Were you not such a sneering halfwit, you would probably ascertain -- correctly -- that nobody here thinks your comments are even worth reading. Now go be a good little troll and find some traffic to play in while the rest of us debate.
  Considerate: 40%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I have already explained to you once that calling someone a conspiracy theorist simply because they do not agree with you is nothing more than an ad hominem fallacy. It says nothing about me, and everything about your refusal to examine the facts with an open mind. People who accept whatever they are told without ever asking questions are simply not very intelligent people. You want to smear my character with a generic label of "conspiracy theorist" without actually knowing my views on any topic other than 9/11, and that is absolutely ridiculous.
You are in a small minority of people who believe the official version of events regarding 9/11, as I have already demonstrated by linking an appropriate study conducted by the University of Kent. Quite frankly, I find your opinions to be unintelligent to the point that they are borderline offensive. You are not interested in examining facts or evidence, only with attacking what you arbitrarily interpret as "conspiracy theories". The official narrative of 9/11 is a theory about a conspiracy of Muslims who flew halfway around the world and attacked America. There is little to no reliable evidence it is true and indeed large portions of the official narrative are contradicted by the known facts. Hence, for you to accuse me of being a conspiracy theorist for being sceptical about the validity of that conspiracy theory almost beggars belief.
Do you also believe it to be a conspiracy theory that Saddam Hussein did not possess weapons of mass destruction? Or that Saddam Hussein had no ties to al Qaeda? Because those false claims were made repeatedly by the exact same administration you seem prepared to believe without question about 9/11.
I simply find you to be naive to the point that it is almost childlike. Instead of actually addressing the topic, or assessing the multitude of evidence I have posted in this very thread which casts doubt on the 9/11 narrative, instead you're telling me the plot of Alice in Wonderland.
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
That's not true. I get some paper towels.
Did you manage to find the website I mentioned?
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 67%  
  Learn More About Debra
I reckon he knows that its all made up dog mess because there cant be any body who would ever believe that baloney any way. Hes just a sissy boy trying to look big because whenyou look at it what has he actually said. he says totally nothing and he refuses to answer questions and he is a big also because I caught him out big time lying and posting fake videos and links. So if he really does debate like he says he does why does he just swear and diss every body. Its because he cant even argue his way out of a paper bag thats been popped so thats why he lies and carries on like that all the time. So thats all right because sissy boys like that make every one else here look better any way.
  Considerate: 55%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
You are very literally one of the thickest people I've ever encountered. Go away you absolutely pointless piece of gutter trash.
  Considerate: 21%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
You are very literally one of the thickest people I've ever encountered
I find that remark very offensive to the thickest people on the planet they as they are gifted compared to Barndoor
  Considerate: 67%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
Your guilt-by-association fallacies are ridiculous. Qanon has got absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 and you will not find any university professors backing Qanon with peer-reviewed research. Frankly, you are a complete and total imbecile.
  Considerate: 35%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well thats all right because you say worse things to every body else like
And thats just for starters. You said that to everyone on this site except 2 Yes every one because I checked when they say something you don't like.
So, this is from some one who talks down to every one and whose much better then every one and insults instead of debating. when you are going to leave this site then we will all celebrate and debate without having this plastered all over the place.
  Considerate: 31%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Thanks for producing that amusing highlight reel of my best insults, although quite what any of that has to do with the topic is a mystery.
Perhaps you should come back if you ever develop enough intelligence to have a debate.
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
You have invested in an astonishing guilt-by-association fallacy. If chemtrails aren't real, that says nothing about the Gulf of Tonkin incident. If vaxx conspiracies aren't real, that says nothing about the assassination of JFK. I'm at a complete loss for words as to why you would draw invisible dots between completely unrelated events and judge one hypothesis about one event on the basis of another hypothesis about another event. That's literally absurd.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.16  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
You're using a double negative (another fallacy). A fallacy is a misuse. It's a distortion of logic.
That would be an appeal to a consensus of authority, which would not be a fallacy. You're extraordinarily confused and are attempting to compare something which you just admitted is a real fallacy, with a false accusation of fallacy. That is something commonly referred to as a false equivalence and -- predictably -- it's another fallacy.
An appeal to authority isn't really a fallacy in and of itself, since sourcing credible information is simply a logical thing to do in order to support your own argument. It only becomes a fallacy if there are alternative credible perspectives which you willfully ignore, the expert you quote doesn't actually agree with what you say, or you attempt to confuse someone with highly technical language which only an expert in the relative field of study could possibly comprehend.
I don't know what that even means, buddy. This topic isn't about conspiracy theories. It's about 9/11 and whether you believe it was an inside job.
Just bizarre. Nobody is flooding the zone except you. You've taken a very specific topic and tried to change it into a general discussion about conspiracy theories.
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Clearly you have not. You have not developed the intelligence to have a debate, and that is abundantly well-evidenced by your trash posts.
  Considerate: 40%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 43%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Oh, the guy who pops into the debate just to call me names says I'm pathologically antagonistic? That's nice.
Your smear tactics illustrate poignantly what you are: an absolute sneering coward. Since it's patently obvious you're never going to overcome the litany of facts I'm armed with, you choose instead to resort to name-calling and dirty psychological tricks like encouraging mockery and abuse. You haven't even attempted to construct an argument. You've simply come in here to call me names.
The cold, hard truth of the matter is that you're a monstrously evil toad who literally supports apartheid and genocide. I've caught you telling barefaced lies three times in only the last 24 hours. You're accusing me of being a "conspiracy nut" on the solitary basis that I'm not foolish enough to believe your 9/11 conspiracy theory, and the reason I'm not foolish enough to believe your 9/11 conspiracy theory is because it contradicts all of the known facts. That has been abundantly well-established by every independent journalist, scientist and researcher unaffiliated with the US government who has ever looked into the matter. Your conspiracy theory was manufactured by an administration of neo-fascist, Zionist crooks who lied America into two wars that killed millions, and I am not a "conspiracy nut" for having enough common sense to see it as the outrageous pack of lies it so self-evidently is.
  Considerate: 50%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Nomenclature
It's very amusing. You get triggered because deep down you know you're full of it.
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 45%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
It's very amusing. You get triggered because deep down you know you're full of it.
It's very amusing. You get triggered because a photo of a Palestinian child getting carried to his funeral has you babbling about shopping malls as your best response to such atrocities
  Considerate: 65%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Deep down I know you're a gutless coward who is too frightened to debate the facts. All you know is deception and fallacy. You want to win the argument but you know that isn't possible if you debate the facts, so instead you employ a textbook "emperor has no clothes" approach and mock anybody who dares state the obvious. Frankly, I just think you're a pathetic and horrible individual.
  Considerate: 40%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Aw. I wasn't gonna ask you for a date.
  Considerate: 27%  
  Substantial: 58%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra