DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Did hillary's personality cause her the presidency or her email?
Debate Information
What do you think?
What do you think?
Live Poll
What do you think?
16 votes
Personality
81.25%
Other Events
18.75%
DebateIsland.com Founder/Administrator| Contact Me Via Private Messaging (aarong), Contact Support At customerservice@debateisland.com | Happy Debating!
null
Great point DericWM2001, I agree with that. China is unlikely to have hacked the election. Also, I believe her personality caused her the election.
And btw, I think it was the email along with the discovery of the past political history of the Clintons that caused Hillary to lose the US Presidential Elections.
Personality, and I think she's done alot worse than those emails.
I am no longer active on DebateIsland or any debate website. Many things I have posted here and on other sites (Such as believing in the flat Earth theory or other conspiracy theories such as those that are about the Las Vegas Shooting or 9/11) do not reflect on my current views.
I think she is the perfect example of a very intelligent person who clings to their intelligence too much even when something else is needed.
This approach works in her professional field (law), where a logical, intelligent, persuasive argument is what wins the case. However, this simply does not work as well in front of dozens millions people, many of which know very little about anything related to politics, economics, foreign relations or sociology. In such cases, you need charisma, you need catch phrases, you need excitement. Hillary just kept talking raw policies and statistics. In a way, she was too intelligent for the average voter, although she also did not connect to people as much as she should have due to her somewhat defensive character.
Add to it the fact that she swayed quite a bit to the left, compared to what people loved in her husband, one of the best presidents in the history of the US... And that she also angered a lot of "BernieBros" who felt that she "stole" the election from him... And people's disappointment in Obama's presidency, who had a pretty similar political platform to her... And you get the situation in which Trump is one of the few Republican politicians against which she had a decent chance of winning.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 11%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 28%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Great point DericWM2001, I agree with that. China is unlikely to have hacked the election. Also, I believe her personality caused her the election.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 51%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 20%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 34%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 23%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 38%  
  Substantial: 11%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.46  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 14%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p6M-VgXHwwdpJarhyQYapBz-kRc6FrgdOLFAd3IfYz8/edit
https://debateisland.com/discussion/comment/18248/#Comment_18248 (Me officially stating that I am no longer a flat-Earther)
  Considerate: 54%  
  Substantial: 24%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
This approach works in her professional field (law), where a logical, intelligent, persuasive argument is what wins the case. However, this simply does not work as well in front of dozens millions people, many of which know very little about anything related to politics, economics, foreign relations or sociology. In such cases, you need charisma, you need catch phrases, you need excitement. Hillary just kept talking raw policies and statistics. In a way, she was too intelligent for the average voter, although she also did not connect to people as much as she should have due to her somewhat defensive character.
Add to it the fact that she swayed quite a bit to the left, compared to what people loved in her husband, one of the best presidents in the history of the US... And that she also angered a lot of "BernieBros" who felt that she "stole" the election from him... And people's disappointment in Obama's presidency, who had a pretty similar political platform to her... And you get the situation in which Trump is one of the few Republican politicians against which she had a decent chance of winning.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra