Dreamer quote.    I am concerned for you that you are not taking climate change seriously.

Got that right.

Dreamer quote    A pregnant woman drown near where I live due to flash flooding from torrential rain.

 And such things never happened before?   C’mon ma-a-a-ate.    Blaming every tragedy or extreme weather event on HIGW is getting a bit old.    Drought?    Blame global warming.  Floods?  Blame global warming.   Extreme heat?   Blame global warming.  Extreme cold?    With a bit of creativilty, the Alarmists can blame that on global warming too.

Dreamer quote     "We now know that the smog that climatologists call ‘aerosols’ – emitted by human activities into the atmosphere – caused localised cooling closest to the areas where most of it originated. Smogs constitute a deadly health hazard"

 Oh, for God’s sake!    I set you some homework to try and see if you had a functioning brain?  You disappointed me.    Okay, let’s try it again.    I have already explained to you why the climate scientists in the early 1970’s genuinely thought that the world was about to plunge into a new ice age.     That was because they knew that the earth warmed and cooled, warmed and cooled, in roughly 1000 year cycles.    They knew that every tenth cycle that the earths climate would experience an interglacial mini ice age.    They counted back the warming periods since our last inter glacial, and discovered to their horror that our present warming period is the last in the series.    They reasonably deduced that the fall in global temperatures from 1930 to 1970 was the beginning of the new interglacial ice age.    Got it now?    Comprendevous? 

 Now, if you have a functioning brain, then why do you think that the character who wrote your little “How To Debate Alarmists” website sort of forgot to mention WHY the climate scientists in 1970  thought that an ice age was imminent?       C’mon boy!    Turn on your critical analysis circuit and think in an impartial way.     Do you think that the reason why he did not mention this crucial fact in his little “explanation” about the 1970’s global cooling, was because if he explained why the scientists thought that way, then he would have had to explain about the ten warming periods between interglacial ice ages?    Hmmmmmm?

 He could not do that, because although he probably thinks that the doe eyed idealists who swallow this global warming gunk are du-mb, they might be smart enough to figure out that there is another explanation for global warming, one demonstrably independent of CO2.   And he could not put that germ of an idea in your head.

Dreamer quote    The important part is that aerosols caused localized cooling as the planet continued to heat up. 

 Yeah, don’t think for yourself.      Let the Elmer Gantry’s of the world provide you with arguments which you cut and paste.    But if you ever bothered to think about them, you would realise that they do not make sense.  

Dreamer quote        As for the climate myth #1 the climate has changed before. "Rapid climate change, of the type we're causing through our enormous carbon dioxide emissions, falls into the very dangerous camp. That's because the faster the change, the harder it is for nature to cope. We are part of nature so if it goes down, it takes us with it. "

 Yeah, yeah.  We are all going to die and the earth will turn into Venus unless we allow the unelected and extremely well off unelected, jet setting administrators of our western countries to dictate to the deplorable herd of plebs, what cars we may drive, what size shower heads we may use, what fuel we can use in our pizza ovens,  and what we can eat.   

Dreamer quote   I remember you posting the newspaper clipping but I don't see it anymore.

 They are all on page three.   Tell ya what, I will post them up for you again.    I would love to post up two of the more notorious “climategate” emails ,but unfortunately, I lost that data when my hard drive went bung.

@Bogan ;There is no way in hell that you can blame the previous 9 warming periods on human activity.  

That is a fact but the other fact is that your trying to twist facts to make an argument that doesn't count. Because the other warming periods didn't have bogins doing donuts in there Holdin pickups and burning tons of gas and rubber and the factories that make those cars plus heaps of other polluting things weren't a round then were they. And since no one was a round in those days to take the temperature and the geological data is sketchy and not accurate you cant say that those warming periods were the same as what we have now. So therefore any one including blind Freddie can see that what were doing is screwing up the planet. Why dont you give a boat skipper a slab of 4x to take you out and see the Barrier reef and then tell him that this warming period is the same as the other warming periods when the reef was still there.

Five million people are dying a year from climate change. We are in the middle of the sixth great extinction. The oceans are acidifying.
Too much tolerance and freedom becomes callousness and indifference. Jail climate change denier leaders, the merchants of doubt.

First, 5 million people are not dying a year from climate change.  The actual number is 116,000 heat deaths a year.  And higher temps reduce cold deaths by 283,000 people annually, so the net effect is more lives are currently being saved from global warming (See https://lomborg.com/heresy-heat-and-cold-deaths, https://financialpost.com/opinion/bjorn-lomborg-climate-change-and-deaths-from-extreme-heat-and-cold)  

Even future forecasts by 2100 do not put the number of deaths as high as 5 million a year.  Where did you get your data?  

Secondly, I can see your zeal, and I believe climate change is real, but much of what is proposed to "solve" the problem is either , unfeasible, or nothing more than wealth redistribution masking as concern for the planet.  Sit down for this:

In fact, the U.S. could cut its carbon dioxide emissions 100 percent and it would not make a difference in abating global warming.

Using the same climate sensitivity (the warming effect of a doubling of carbon dioxide emissions) as the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assumes in its modeling, the world would be only 0.137 degree Celsius cooler by 2100. Even if we assumed every other industrialized country would be equally on board, this would merely avert warming by 0.278 degree Celsius by the turn of the century.  - Source: Heritage Foundation, 
Green New Deal Would Barely Change Earth’s Temperature. Here Are the Facts

So if the whole world had 0 emissions today, the global temperature would still be 3-5.5 degrees Celsius higher by 2100 with only a 0.278 projected abating in the current forecasts.  Now, that is not going to happen.  You aren't going to reach 0 emissions today, nor tomorrow, nor in the next 100 years.  To do so would be to destroy 3 world economies.  Surely, you don't want that and recognize that many developing nations will in the short term need more CO2 energy to raise their economies up.  

Many of the proposals for climate change come with astronomical price tags and will change global temperatures by 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 degree Celsius by 2100.  That is why the Nobel Prize winner for Climate Economics, William Nordhaus, warns that we should not throw away tons of money on things that won't solve the issue.  There are many things that can be done - investment in technology is the biggest.  It is our greatest hope.  But many plans proposed are evil in that they may be zealous to "solve global warming" but fail to accomplish that while harming poor people the most.

Obama's proposed Clean Power Plan would have taken up to 20% of the lowest quintile's take home pay out of their pocket due to increased energy costs and inflation (particularly hard hit would have been the mid-west).  That was the finding of over 5 different studies on the effects.  Bet you didn't hear that in your class lectures did you?

@Bogan ;FACT.   Most of the previous 1000 year warming period have been a lot hotter than the one we are now experiencing, although, since it hs not yet reached it's peak, it may, or may not, go higher than previous warming periods.  

Wrong and you didn't say that it can be verified because guess what it cant and you maid that up.

Yes, the environmental justice aspect that the bottom quintile will pay more is a valid point. This is balanced out by better air quality. If poor people can't work due to asthma from coal plants they earning less money.
"More recent estimates of the health related costs of air pollution are staggering."
Steven Novella on August 31, 2022
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/healthcare-costs-of-air-pollution/
Right now fossil fuel companies are making money off of economic rent. Socialized costs are picked up by taxpayers in the form of medicare and medicaid.

@Dreamer ;Where is the .02 degree Celsius number coming from?

I think that most of it comes from burning fossil fuels and there is a lot of evidence for that and also the gases that come from cows because we eat to much red meat. If you look at chickens they dont put out any where near the amount of gases wait by wait as cows and we can process them a lot easier and we dont need to eat dairy either because we can eat tofu and have soy milk. So as soon as we stop making cheeze burgers and drive battery cars the world is going to be better off and we will easily brake the targets.

@Bogan ;so I will ask it again. 

And every one else will ask you again why the global warming is heaps more now than the Midevil period. And every one will tell you again that its because all the red necks and the bogins in there mussel cars doing burn outs. All the red necks could do in those days was rape and pillage because they couldn't do burn outs in there chariots and they didn't have factories all over the place and they didn't have air cons and airosole cans. About the only thing that is the same as those days is that the red necks and bogins are still so dents between the ears that nothing much more than what they want to know ever syncs in.

https://skepticalscience.com/global-warming-stopped-in-1998.htm

@Bogan ;99.99999% of physicists disagreed with James van Allen

 Could you please tell us who conducted this poll, was it a secret ballot,  and how it was done?

If your only explanation for our present global warming

You know that your twisting the facts and deliberately leaving things out and refusing to answer to the facts. Because you have been told a zillion times all ready that it is proven that the global warming now is mush higher than all the other global warmings and there is heaps of evidence that was shown to you that you still ignore. Just as well bogins and red necks don't get any say in things and never become top politicians because apart from having very little brains the world would be a total mess if they had there way and people ever took them seriously.