DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Sex is not the process of breeding, to copulate, to mate and what you
are addressing is the implication that GOD is basically gender based without
legal cause / necessity, there is GOD and GODDESS not just GOD. I still question this as odd. Here again if
there is a GODDESS and not one GOD the creation of a goddess is implied from
the breeding of a women with GOD allowing for the bith of a female child. Goddess. While there are still a great deal of demons
both male and female who are known to copulate with humans.
DUH! Do the simple math Bible fool, many divisions of Christianity comically accept that Jesus is in fact, Yahweh god incarnate (2 Peter 1:1, and the Trinity Doctrine). Therefore, when believing that Jesus is god, then in the virgin birth scenario, Jesus “celestially impregnated” his own mother Mary through godly incest. When Jesus did this act, he not only became Mary’s son, but his own Father as being Yahweh/God incarnate, AND a bastard child through true Hebrew tradition because Joseph was not the paternal father! 2+2=4.
As if the forgoing wasn’t bizarre enough, then by Joseph not being the paternal father to Jesus, but only a step-father, then when JESUS AS GOD was in the act of celestially impregnating his mother Mary, where poor ol’ Joseph may have heard Mary shouting; "oh GOD, oh GOD," but little did Joseph know at the time how apropos this statement was. LOL!
@John_C_87 Take Christianism for example and the beautiful children story about how Jesus was born. So Mary is a virgin and gets engaged to Joseph and while they were walking through the dessert one day some angels ambushed them and said to Mary hay there bitsh pull your gown up and bend over because our boss wants to do you and get your tin roof rusted. So she says no. Then the angel say a second time spread those legs bitsh and again she says no and then the angels said now look here bitsh if you dont give up your front bottom right now for our master he is going to punish the crap out of you and all your family. So she had to give in in the end and so God came a long and sank the salami and got her in the pudding club. Nower days of course you just simply call that sort of thing as rape.
@21CenturyIconoclast DUH! Do the simple math Bible fool, many divisions of Christianity comically accept that Jesus is in fact, Yahweh god incarnate (2 Peter 1:1, and the Trinity Doctrine). Therefore, when believing that Jesus is god, then in the virgin birth scenario, Jesus “celestially impregnated” his own mother Mary through godly incest. When Jesus did this act, he not only became Mary’s son, but his own Father as being Yahweh/God incarnate, AND a bastard child through true Hebrew tradition because Joseph was not the paternal father! 2+2=4.
@Barnardot Nower days of course you just simply call that sort of thing as rape.
A different take might be that the Arc Angle
Lucifer having been banished from the heavens by GOD seduced Mary by assuming
the appearance of Joesph. Gabriel only appears to address matters of great
importance whereas Mary is stopped on the road an told by other angles she is
to be visited by GOD which is a truth but yet still a deception as it is Lucifer
who may have impregnated Mary as it is impossible for GOD to do such thing. This
idea is more inline with Greek understandings of religious possible deities.
The 6 Billion dallar legal argument in America being GOD is and was only a religion....
@John_C_87 This idea is more inline with Greek understandings of religious possible deities.
Well that is another take on the same passage in the Bible. So what amazes me is that the same thing can be taken to mean completely different opposite things depending on witch side your toast is butted.
It isn't taken to mean it is the use of the same principle as
it is the Greek Deities who are noted to interact sexually with humans. It is
simply a grasp of how GOD might create Adam as the first male human. The
translation moves the creation of demi-Gods by birth of a women to a GOD.
Meanwhile the mysteries of self-evident truth GOD had been left unsolved by the
intellectual powers of many religious beliefs. To be blunt GOD does not need
tax exemption to be fact it only need the right to equal representation taxation
may or may not be able to supply.
DUH! Do the simple math Bible fool, many divisions of Christianity comically accept that Jesus is in fact, Yahweh god incarnate (2 Peter 1:1, and the Trinity Doctrine). Therefore, when believing that Jesus is god, then in the virgin birth scenario, Jesus “celestially impregnated” his own mother Mary through godly incest. When Jesus did this act, he not only became Mary’s son, but his own Father as being Yahweh/God incarnate, AND a bastard child through true Hebrew tradition because Joseph was not the paternal father! 2+2=4.
YOUR ONCE AGAIN RESPONSE: "Are you saying Jesus was a Egyptian Pharaoh?
Listen up Bible fool, what does my quote above have to do with an Egyptian Pharaoh? You're once again grasping for proverbial straws that are not even there for you to begin with! LOL!
NEXT PSEUDO-CHRISTIAN LIKE "JOHN_C_87" THAT HAS TO THROW INTO THE DISCUSSION A TOPIC THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MY PREVIOUS QUOTE TO BUY TIME FOR HIM TO CONTINUE TO HIDE FROM THE MAIN TOPIC, WILL BE ...?
@21CenturyIconoclast Listen up Bible fool, what does my quote above have to do with an Egyptian Pharaoh? You're once again grasping for proverbial straws that are not even there for you to begin with! LOL! Jesus “celestially impregnated” his own mother Mary through godly incest
Simple, you are suggesting incest and the most
well know archaeological information connects that to Pharaohs.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
Inanna-Ishtar, Aphrodite, Bai Mudan, Eos, Athena, Artemis, Hera, Selene, and Cerce, just to name a few.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Sex is not the process of breeding, to copulate, to mate and what you are addressing is the implication that GOD is basically gender based without legal cause / necessity, there is GOD and GODDESS not just GOD. I still question this as odd. Here again if there is a GODDESS and not one GOD the creation of a goddess is implied from the breeding of a women with GOD allowing for the bith of a female child. Goddess. While there are still a great deal of demons both male and female who are known to copulate with humans.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
YOUR BIBLE IGNORANT QUOTE: "In some religions a women is only described as being able to breed with GOD."
https://www.debateisland.com/discussion/comment/167636/#Comment_167636
DUH! Do the simple math Bible fool, many divisions of Christianity comically accept that Jesus is in fact, Yahweh god incarnate (2 Peter 1:1, and the Trinity Doctrine). Therefore, when believing that Jesus is god, then in the virgin birth scenario, Jesus “celestially impregnated” his own mother Mary through godly incest. When Jesus did this act, he not only became Mary’s son, but his own Father as being Yahweh/God incarnate, AND a bastard child through true Hebrew tradition because Joseph was not the paternal father! 2+2=4.
As if the forgoing wasn’t bizarre enough, then by Joseph not being the paternal father to Jesus, but only a step-father, then when JESUS AS GOD was in the act of celestially impregnating his mother Mary, where poor ol’ Joseph may have heard Mary shouting; "oh GOD, oh GOD," but little did Joseph know at the time how apropos this statement was. LOL!
A very revealing truthful image to Mary's birth of Jesus: https://www.imagebam.com/view/MEPE5OJ
Christianity as the diaper of humanity in our beginning as a human race.
NEXT?
.  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
DUH! Do the simple math Bible fool, many divisions of Christianity comically accept that Jesus is in fact, Yahweh god incarnate (2 Peter 1:1, and the Trinity Doctrine). Therefore, when believing that Jesus is god, then in the virgin birth scenario, Jesus “celestially impregnated” his own mother Mary through godly incest. When Jesus did this act, he not only became Mary’s son, but his own Father as being Yahweh/God incarnate, AND a bastard child through true Hebrew tradition because Joseph was not the paternal father! 2+2=4.
Are you saying Jesus was a Egyptian Pharaoh?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Nower days of course you just simply call that sort of thing as rape.
A different take might be that the Arc Angle Lucifer having been banished from the heavens by GOD seduced Mary by assuming the appearance of Joesph. Gabriel only appears to address matters of great importance whereas Mary is stopped on the road an told by other angles she is to be visited by GOD which is a truth but yet still a deception as it is Lucifer who may have impregnated Mary as it is impossible for GOD to do such thing. This idea is more inline with Greek understandings of religious possible deities.
The 6 Billion dallar legal argument in America being GOD is and was only a religion....
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well that is another take on the same passage in the Bible. So what amazes me is that the same thing can be taken to mean completely different opposite things depending on witch side your toast is butted.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
It isn't taken to mean it is the use of the same principle as it is the Greek Deities who are noted to interact sexually with humans. It is simply a grasp of how GOD might create Adam as the first male human. The translation moves the creation of demi-Gods by birth of a women to a GOD. Meanwhile the mysteries of self-evident truth GOD had been left unsolved by the intellectual powers of many religious beliefs. To be blunt GOD does not need tax exemption to be fact it only need the right to equal representation taxation may or may not be able to supply.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
DUH! Do the simple math Bible fool, many divisions of Christianity comically accept that Jesus is in fact, Yahweh god incarnate (2 Peter 1:1, and the Trinity Doctrine). Therefore, when believing that Jesus is god, then in the virgin birth scenario, Jesus “celestially impregnated” his own mother Mary through godly incest. When Jesus did this act, he not only became Mary’s son, but his own Father as being Yahweh/God incarnate, AND a bastard child through true Hebrew tradition because Joseph was not the paternal father! 2+2=4.
YOUR ONCE AGAIN RESPONSE: "Are you saying Jesus was a Egyptian Pharaoh?
Listen up Bible fool, what does my quote above have to do with an Egyptian Pharaoh? You're once again grasping for proverbial straws that are not even there for you to begin with! LOL!
NEXT PSEUDO-CHRISTIAN LIKE "JOHN_C_87" THAT HAS TO THROW INTO THE DISCUSSION A TOPIC THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MY PREVIOUS QUOTE TO BUY TIME FOR HIM TO CONTINUE TO HIDE FROM THE MAIN TOPIC, WILL BE ...?
.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Listen up Bible fool, what does my quote above have to do with an Egyptian Pharaoh? You're once again grasping for proverbial straws that are not even there for you to begin with! LOL!
Jesus “celestially impregnated” his own mother Mary through godly incest
Simple, you are suggesting incest and the most well know archaeological information connects that to Pharaohs.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra