Hello:
I've said it before, and I'm saying it again.. If we don't guard our rights, we'll LOSE them. I've posted many times about this very issue. I've EMPHASIZED the Bill of Rights, wherein the CITIZENS of this great country of ours, are indemnified FROM the cops - not the other way around. Trump thinks that's a bug. But, our founders made it a feature. I suggest you read the 1st Amendment.. It's only about 45 easily understandable words. While you're at it, why don't you read the entire Bill of Rights?? They're only about 650 easily understandable words..
If Trump gets elected and gives the police UNLIMITED power, we're done.
excon
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
Now, pro-criminal leftists have tried to make police officer's jobs harder to do since 2014. No doubt. But the hysteria from the left today, is more because Biden doesn't want to talk about how
polls for 6 of 7 Battle Ground States have Trump Winning
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Can't read your article but I trust trump said he wants to indemnify police officers. My question is does he mean more than the court statute of 1983 extending 'good faith' indemnity already?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Let's add this to the fake Trump Russian collusion hysteria pile.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I take it you presume he means with no qualifications?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra