"Unfair universe" paradox

You are on the wrong topic, Factfinder.   This one is for adults only.     Find your toys and go and play in the middle of the road.

Actually, it was a sneery three liner.     Just like your capacity for logic and reason, your ability to count is vestigial.  

well, we are done. @Bogan

Bogan said:

Actually, it was a sneery three liner.     Just like your capacity for logic and reason, your ability to count is vestigial.  

Yet you lose and concede another debate. Ever wonder if you'll ever make a logical point or do you intend on blindly clinging to your religion?

Not worth responding to. 

 Try writing an entire 350 word article starting with a clearly stated premise that you are prepared to defend with a reasoned argument.     Writing sneery one liners, or simply submitting curt replies dealing entirely in implications is hardly going to impress anybody into thinking you have an opinion worth reading.    Neither is, pejorative abuse, using AI, or just continually asking loaded Dorothy Dixer questions.     You may think that it makes you look authoritative, but it just makes you look like an ignorant person winging it to vainly defend a position he passionately holds, but has little knowledge of.

  When you finally admit that you were wrong all along, don’t forget to indulge yourself in a little self flagellation.   It is should do wonders for your over inflated ego.   And don’t forget to grovel at my feet and beg forgiveness for being an obstructionist arsehole who is more concerned with suppressing debate than arguing out a topical subject based upon it’s merits.

@maxx ;   you can act like dee all you want and pretend you won.

You are the one who does not want to continue, Max.     I am still full of fight and rearing to go.    You are the one who dodges every reasonable question that I put to you, which hardly supports the idea that you have any knowledge of what you are claiming is valid.       You are the one who ignores most of what i write and only focuses on what you can get some mileage out of.   And finally, you are the one who can not think up any argument supporting your position, and can only use links as "evidence", that any countervailing argument exists at all.   .    And when I pick apart one of your links and show quite clearly how unscientific it is, you make no mention of what I wrote.     If you really thought that these "scientific" links had nailed it, I would have thought that you would have at least gone through my critique of your "scientific" link and addressed what I wrote, point by point?   But you could not even manage that.   The fact that you did not, seems to me that you either do not even read all that I write?     Or, that you, yourself could see that my criticism of your "scientific" link was right on the money?    And you did not know what to do about that?   

It is quite interesting.      You have this idea that religious people think that 2+2=3, and then you are unable to fathom your own similar religious mindset?     I do not know why you think that races are equal?   I can only presume that it has been banged into your head for so long that you have simply internalized it as a Absolute Truth.     And this potty idea is constantly reinforced in your head by your culture and your peers, so it never  occurred to you to ever question it?    It is child's play to prove that this premise is wrong to any thinking person who has an impartial mindset.   That this is why so many young people have this religious like belief which they themselves can not justify.   It is also the reason why  so many of my opponents refuse to even submit an argument as to why they think that races are equal.   They never thought that they would ever have to.     They know that they have no way of proving what that so desperately want to believe is an Absolute Truth.     That is why so many of them like Factfinder just get angry and try and stifle the debate.       Which is definitely a religious mindset.    Refusal to put your side of any argument in a debate is a major weakness of my opponents, and continued refusal to do so constitutes dishonesty.     You, however were smart enough to know in your heart that races are not equal, even though you obviously want to believe that they are.   So, you retreated to a more defensible position.

You more defensible position was to claim that races do not exist, when they self evidently do exist.    Once again, it is easy to prove that they exist, especially since lefties quite obviously see races themselves when it is convenient for them to do so.   But no amount of proof can ever make anyone accept anything that they just do not want to believe.    Human races equate to sub species, and once again, that is quite easy to prove.     You did your best by submitting "scientific" links which denied this to support your view, but they were hardly scientific,.    All I had to do was provide you with a definition of sub species, and list the characteristics which apply that define sub species, to prove to you that humans conform to that definition, and to those same characteristics.  .     I asked you the crucial  questions as to how humans races do not conform to the scientific definition of sub species, and the defining characteristics of a sub species?     And once again you refused to answer a couple of very simple but very crucial questions.    Then you then headed for the door.   Checkmate.   

Bogan said:

Not worth responding to. 

 Try writing an entire 350 word article starting with a clearly stated premise that you are prepared to defend with a reasoned argument.     Writing sneery one liners, or simply submitting curt replies dealing entirely in implications is hardly going to impress anybody into thinking you have an opinion worth reading.    Neither is, pejorative abuse, using AI, or just continually asking loaded Dorothy Dixer questions.     You may think that it makes you look authoritative, but it just makes you look like an ignorant person winging it to vainly defend a position he passionately holds, but has little knowledge of.

  When you finally admit that you were wrong all along, don’t forget to indulge yourself in a little self flagellation.   It is should do wonders for your over inflated ego.   And don’t forget to grovel at my feet and beg forgiveness for being an obstructionist arsehole who is more concerned with suppressing debate than arguing out a topical subject based upon it’s merits.

Says "not worth responding to" then proceeds to write two full multi sentence paragraphs whining and crying in response! Classic.  

@Factfinder

Not worth responding to. 

 Try writing an entire 350 word article starting with a clearly stated premise that you are prepared to defend with a reasoned argument.     Writing sneery one liners or simply submitting curt replies dealing entirely in implications is hardly going to impress anybody into thinking you have an opinion worth reading.    Neither is, pejorative abuse, or just continually asking loaded Dorothy Dixer questions.     You may think that it makes you look authoritative, but it just makes you look like an ignorant person winging it to vainly defend a position he passionately holds, but has little knowledge of.

  When you finally admit that you were wrong all along, don’t forget to indulge yourself in a little self flagellation.   It is should do wonders for your over inflated ego.   And don’t forget to grovel at my feet and beg forgiveness for being an obstructionist arsehole who is more concerned with suppressing debate than arguing out a topical subject based upon it’s merits.