Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/blitzkrieg
  Considerate: 73%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.24  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 24%  
  Learn More About Debra
I'd caution you from using phrases like "Obvious truth" when you just now posted your very first ever reference for source data on the topic of Blitzkrieg.
And while Blitzkrieg has been used in particular situations to penetrate the defenses of an opponent. It's also been used to crush offensive lines. Offense defeating offense. If ALL strategies must have EVERYTHING revolve around defense then this situation falls short and proves.....again, that your conclusion is incorrect.
Some...absolutely. Most, sure I'll agree to that. All? No, I'm afraid not.
You can SAY that every offensive strategy is just a furtherance of a defense just as I could SAY that every defense strategy is simply a furtherance of the offense. But in reality there are cases where Offense can exist independent and exclusive from Defense. To suggest otherwise is the same error as stating "He ALWAYS" does that. It's simply not true.
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stup!d".
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
And yes, defending against a defense is offense but it ends up revolving around defense whereas attacking an attack revolves around defence and not offence.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra