DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
If we defunded the left, such as getting rid of every department that exists for the sole purpose of redistributing wealth to buy votes for liberals, the left would cease to exist in one generation.
So there was a dateline or something on last night covering the homeless in California. If you care about these people and if you believe it's a problem, why would you allow even more, essentially homeless illegals into their state and allow them to use taxpayer funds, when there isn't adequate resources for legal citizens? if there is a finite and inadequate number of resources, how can you then attempt to share what there isn't enough of to begin with?
"I'm just a soul whose intentions are good Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood" The Animals
We could also defund all religious people, so they quit their preaching and let everyone else develop science and technology without being pestered. But then the "right" would fall apart as well, would it not? Oh well...
Both Republican and Democratic party have long outlived their usefulness. It is time for new parties to emerge, focused on tomorrow and not yesterday. Technological Party, Libertarian Party (not the current one) and Cosmopolitan Party are long overdue. It is silly that we still are bickering on whether gays should or should not be able to marry, when at the same time developing quantum computing and genetic engineering. We are like cavemen who were suddenly teleported into an industrial society, not knowing how to live in it.
Nothing like willful leftist ignorance. Every dime that is redistributed is yo fund the left. Get rid of that and no one would vote for a lefty.
Social programs and redistribution aren't really things leftists use to campaign. Maybe they'll say they'll defend them, but I don't think they use the programs' existences as campaigning material.
Not directly, but it gives religious institutions preference when it comes to tax collection (at least, in the majority of states, as far as I know).
That said, I am not being serious. I have nothing against churches, and, in fact, in harder times several churches helped me quite a bit, despite me not being religious. Many churches are essentially charity organizations, and it makes sense to exempt them from taxes.
But the OP's post did not really warrant a serious response, did it?
ROFL. Hillary and Bernie were vying for who could give away more of my money to those who did not earn it. Save your ignorance and lies for your lefty buddies; those of us bounded by reality are not swayed. And tell Isco who’s would vote for a lefty without the freebies stolen from the productive?
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
@Theocrat
So there was a dateline or something on last night covering the homeless in California. If you care about these people and if you believe it's a problem, why would you allow even more, essentially homeless illegals into their state and allow them to use taxpayer funds, when there isn't adequate resources for legal citizens? if there is a finite and inadequate number of resources, how can you then attempt to share what there isn't enough of to begin with?
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Both Republican and Democratic party have long outlived their usefulness. It is time for new parties to emerge, focused on tomorrow and not yesterday. Technological Party, Libertarian Party (not the current one) and Cosmopolitan Party are long overdue. It is silly that we still are bickering on whether gays should or should not be able to marry, when at the same time developing quantum computing and genetic engineering. We are like cavemen who were suddenly teleported into an industrial society, not knowing how to live in it.
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
the U.S. government doesn't fund religion.....
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 21%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 31%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 36%  
  Substantial: 42%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 65%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Not directly, but it gives religious institutions preference when it comes to tax collection (at least, in the majority of states, as far as I know).
That said, I am not being serious. I have nothing against churches, and, in fact, in harder times several churches helped me quite a bit, despite me not being religious. Many churches are essentially charity organizations, and it makes sense to exempt them from taxes.
But the OP's post did not really warrant a serious response, did it?
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 54%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 42%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 36%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra