Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
I don't know is it convincing or not but I tried to share some facts with you.
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
You can't claim that those are facts since this is a purely speculative question. In addition, your argument integrates the existence of God, which is a matter of believing or not believing. It's not a "fact."
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
I'm agnostic and even I know that.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 53%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
If one goes to a religious building and speaks to the (minister, preacher, or priest,) couldn't one get the answer, straight from religious individual, and maybe bypass posing the question here?
How many other websites have had this very question, posed on how many religious forums?
I can think of two other websites besides this one.
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 43%  
  Learn More About Debra
Is Jesus alive right now? Obviously not. There is no evidence behind the "resurrection" theory, aside from claims from several people who "witnessed" it - and even whether those claims belonged to actual people, and not something someone made up later, is not very clear. "Jesus have been reborn" is about as proven a claim as "UFO kidnappings" or "ghost stories".
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.44  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 33%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 26%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.78  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
USING VIDEOS DOES NOT PROVE SH¡T. STOP IT!!!
"A communist is like a crocodile" ~Winston Churchill
We're born alone, we live alone, we die alone. Only through our love and friendship can we create the illusion for the moment that we're not alone.~Orson Welles
  Considerate: 44%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.62  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 19%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://www.atheists.org/activism/resources/did-jesus-exist/
From the "Notes" section of the article:
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.48  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 17%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 64%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 57%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.34  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 27%  
  Learn More About Debra
For a while now, this device known as the internet, and some who utilize the internet and present the (For and Against) evidence when it comes to Jesus, and the working theories, the speculations, what is delusion, how science can be used to an extent in the conversation, but science can't be used to prove many things?
In some instances, science can't be used to prove some conversations in regards to science itself?
You can take either take some of the speculations fueled by science, and agree with them on their own merits or not?
So if some agree unto themselves that Jesus was real, and others believe just the opposite, there would appear that maybe when it comes to proving Jesus, and disproving Jesus, that a stalemate of sorts, for a long time to come, is at hand?
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.48  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
Why is the below a fallacy?
When it comes to if Jesus is real or was not, the best source of pro and con conversations, is the internet.
For a while now, this device known as the internet, and some who utilize the internet and present the (For and Against) evidence when it comes to Jesus, and the working theories, the speculations, what is delusion, how science can be used to an extent in the conversation, but science can't be used to prove many things?
In some instances, science can't be used to prove some conversations in regards to science itself?
You can either take some of the speculations fueled by science, and agree with them on their own merits or not?
So, if some agree unto themselves that Jesus was real, and others believe just the opposite, there would appear that maybe when it comes to proving Jesus, and disproving Jesus, that a stalemate of sorts, for a long time to come, is at hand?
Where is your counter argument?
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://twitter.com/Zombieguy19871
Taxation is always theft
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.48  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 74%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Because, you've yet to make a compelling argument to convince me Jesus is real."
Same answer below:
Is there a religious building near you, or within the same city that you live in?
If you see adults and kids going to, and then into the religious building, your question, without any effort, is and has been, already answered.
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2014-10-17/dickson-ill-eat-a-page-from-my-bible-if-jesus-didnt-exist/5820620
Some excerpts from the article:
"Contrary to recent atheist claims, Jesus did live. I will eat a page of my Bible if someone can find me just one full Professor of Ancient History, Classics, or New Testament in an accredited uni who thinks otherwise, writes John Dickson.
There may be good reasons to give up on traditional Christian belief, but today's overreaching sceptics haven't yet stumbled onto them.
Brian Morris, the director of Adelaide's sceptical society "Plain Reason", recently provided a case against Christianity that was neither plain nor reasonable. I don't just mean his pastiche of lines out of the atheist playbook - the barbarity of the crusades, the Inquisition, etc.
As a longtime student of ancient history, my interest was piqued by his enthusiasm around an apparent "wave of contemporary historians" who "question the authenticity of Jesus", who reveal "an endless seam of pious fraud in the Gospels", and who conclude that "the entire Jesus narrative is factually flawed".
Even allowing for a little rhetorical flourish from the head of a club for atheists, almost everything Morris says is either grossly exaggerated or plainly false.
The inspiration for Morris's piece is the recent publication of Richard Carrier's book On the Historicity of Jesus. Carrier is well known to atheist apologists and Christian apologists alike - the two groups are often the mirror image of each other - as the man who earned a PhD from a good ancient history department and has since devoted himself to debating evangelical Christians. His new book is a first (at least for a while): a publication in a peer reviewed context arguing Jesus never lived.
Carrier's thesis is that Jesus started out as a "celestial figure" of religious visions, only to be dressed up in historical garb by the later Gospel writers, after which people began to believe he was a real person. This, too, would be a first. Scholars are used to the myths of, say, Romulus and Remus, the "founders" of Rome. Their legends first appear around 300BC, three or four hundred years after the actual founding of the city."
I saw this article, and thought that Mr. John Dickson could maybe be of help to you?
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.56  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 42%  
  Learn More About Debra