Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: T-Mobile    political beliefs   privacy issues   service provider  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 67%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Race creed    TierneyThe oppression of Our rights   rights   color  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 25%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 1.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Tierney    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 59%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: patriot act    national security   fine print   invasion of our privacy  
  Relevant (Beta): 49%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: legal warrant    phone conversations   private setting   time  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.14  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: legal warrant    right issue   phone conversations   free speech issue  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 66%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: right issue    free speech issue   case   privacy  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
How's that so? I'm interested in hearing this...
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: distinction    difference.How   nbsp    
  Relevant (Beta): 58%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: freedom of speech    privacy rights   difference   people  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: legal privacy problems    privacy rights   difference   legal free speech argumentation  
  Relevant (Beta): 56%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: legal privacy problems    legal free speech argumentation   difference   vice  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
Will do lad! I'm always ready to help!
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 18%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: lad         
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
One could say that it does not have to be as extreme as outright ban on any hurtful speech, but the logic behind proposals in usually best explored in them taken to their logical end.
One could also say that only genuinely hurtful speech, as opposed to what we claim hurts us, should be limited - but that is problematic because of how difficult, if not impossible, it is to practically verify the hurt feelings as opposed to the pretense of them.
I would also argue that the only person who can hurt a person is themselves. It is not other people who make us feel hurt when doing something to us, it is how our psychology reacts to that. No one is hurt by the claim that they are ugly - after all, it is just a few random words - but them taking that claim seriously and wanting badly for it not to be true may result in them feeling hurt.
That said, there are good reasons for limiting certain disrupting free speech expressions. One heckler, for example, could halt an event with thousands people participating, and obviously should be shown out. Spammers also can deal a lot of damage online - imagine if someone creates 100 posts an hour here filled with spam messages! And on a funeral, you do not want someone laughing loudly and telling jokes.
There is this notion of "disturbing the peace", where one person does something that poisons the social environment for everyone else, and that can be sometimes something as minor as an inappropriate comment - but it is highly dependable on the context, and hurt feelings alone are not sufficient for treating the speech as such and taking measures to preserve the social environment.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra