The Second Amendment, and the legal guns, and illegal guns.

@KitRieke

Where are CARS, mentioned in the Second Amendment?

There are more guns owned by all sorts of individuals:

The Militia groups, criminals, offenders, pro gun extremists, and regular gun owners, with a rough total of 393 million guns amongst them.

The U.S. military, has 4.5 million guns.
(According to Wikipedia.)

"Point #3  This subject is just a political football.  Until someone is willing to load a gun and shoot me in order to take my guns. 
This is a waste of time and emotion. 
Spend your energy wisely."

Mentioning about the kids, toddlers, teenagers, students, parents, senior citizens, and Police Officers, being murdered in cold blood, by the thousands each year, isn't a waste of time, emotion, or energy. 

Because those citizens, have had their memorial services, as we speak, and they aren't able to speak for themselves, while you, casually get to express your words @KitRieke, here on the internet.

They deserve Nationwide honor, respect, and courtesy, regardless of your rhetoric.

And regardless of how the Second Amendment, is currently written, and being that the Second Amendment, has ZERO language in it expressing that criminals, or offenders, have the right to bear illegal arms, when they don't have that right.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

"The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution protects the individual right to keep and bear arms.[1][2][a] It was ratified on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights."

And when the next March For Our Lives Rally comes along, I'll be sure to be wearing a shirt that states this:

Where in the #2A, does it state, that any citizen, has the right to bear illegal arms?

And I'll welcome, any news media outlet reporter, who wants to ask me questions, based on what my shirt says.

@TKDB ;
Where are CARS, mentioned in the Second Amendment?
The right to bear arm. The weight to be measured that a car holds is lethal force as united state.

And regardless of how the Second Amendment, is currently written, and being that the Second Amendment, has ZERO language in it expressing that criminals, or offenders, have the right to bear illegal arms, when they don't have that right.
No it does not it just numerically comes before the 5th Amendment. What you have a hard time remembering, or just refuse to understanding when not bearing the weight of arm, if someone else gives up preserving American United state Constitution 5th and not 2nd Amendment they are no longer insuring that others have due process of law. Being in no position to preserve constitution yourself anymore by the forfeit of 2nd amendment, it is by civilly action after the crime you attack others with the weight of a new crime, due to the fact they did not participate in the original crime.

I agree that there is a need for a couple new American Constitutional Amendments. Understanding the weight of liberty and freedom for one.

I agree that there is more that can be done to insure the public safety Constitutionally as it relates to fire-arms and lethal force. However the basic principle of gun for higher to apply lethal force on your behalf is not one of the solutions. It is to be expected from a minor as they are a dependent, from an adult it is inexcusable. 
By the way to be clear a Gun is by basic principle a machine so in the world by definition of constitution it can be united with a car. In the American united State Constitution's 2nd amendment the basic principle is lethal force. It is pre-configured held by a state of the union created so the two things share one point lethal force by basic principle and legal precedent.

The real problem in fire-arms is that the background check contradicts any process of foreground licensing. Meaning that a United State Constitution is not preserved as a requirement in either case of gun possession. How covenant have two added costs to establish multiple things they known from the start are not going to make the needed connection between basic principle and legal precedent. By the way crime is a union made of basic principle and legal precedent.