Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
I agree with you.
"As to the OP, I believe Pelosi knew impeachment was a bad idea, but her tenure as Speaker was likely threatened by the deluded radicals in her party. It appears they are already paying the price."
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Trump Challenges House On Impeachment Vote. Pelosi Says She's Unmoved"
PHILIP EWING
President Trump talks to reporters on the South Lawn of the White House on Friday, demanding that the House formally vote on an impeachment inquiry before responding to lawmakers' requests for documents.
Updated at 5:05 p.m. ET
"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not rule out a vote by the full chamber on its impeachment inquiry into President Trump — but she restated her belief on Friday that none is required for it to move ahead.
Pelosi, D-Calif., said on a trip to Atlanta that she was unmoved by calls from the White House for a full vote. Trump said earlier in the day that he would send a letter to the speaker, which was expected to demand action by the full House.
"We may decide to do it, but it has nothing to do with the president saying what he's saying," Pelosi told reporters, including Robert Jimison of Georgia Public Broadcasting.
Reporters asked Trump at the White House about his willingness to accommodate congressional requests for testimony or documents.
"The lawyers think they've never seen anything so unfair," Trump said. "They've never seen anything so unjust. I've been president now for almost three years, and I've been going through this for almost three years. It's almost become, like, a part of my day."
"Trump has gone back and forth about what he may or may not release from within the administration on the Ukraine affair, and he wasn't clear on Friday about whether he might stop cooperating short of a full House vote."
"Request to Pence
That issue faced its first test not long after Pelosi spoke, when House Democratic chairman announced they're requesting documents from Vice President Pence about his dealings with the government of Ukraine.
Investigators want to know about the role Pence may have played in communicating Trump's desires to Ukrainian leaders that its government launch investigations that might help Trump in the 2020 election.
Katie Waldman, the vice president's press secretary, did not directly address whether Pence's office would give Democrats what they're requesting but did criticize them and their investigation.
"Given the scope, it does not appear to be a serious request but just another attempt by the do-nothing Democrats to call attention to their partisan impeachment," she said.
The White House's letter to Congress is expected to contend that for impeachment to be legitimate, all members in the chambers must have a chance to support or oppose it. Supporters have been making that case for some time already."
"Pelosi said on Friday that Democrats are "very comfortable" with where they are today on the status of the impeachment inquiry.
The House's rules do not mandate a vote for lawmakers to conduct an impeachment investigation, but a vote could give Republicans more power in the Democrat-led inquiry.
It would also force lawmakers in both parties to go on the record for or against the inquiry as headlines fly thick and fast about the Ukraine affair.
While most Republicans so far oppose the impeachment investigation, some GOP lawmakers also have said the Ukraine allegations are worthy of an investigation. They could also face a tough choice if put to a vote by the full House. Some moderate Democrats have yet to take a position.
When does impeachment become impeachment
"Democrats, led initially by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler of New York, argue that they've been acting on impeachment business for months.
Nadler has said as much in his hearings, and attorneys for House Democrats also have invoked impeachment in their separate legal contests with attorneys for Trump over documents and witnesses."
"The White House demand for a full vote represented the latest tactical skirmish within the broader political war over impeachment, which has sucked all the oxygen out of official Washington and largely sidelined other business between the administration and Congress.
Trump and Pelosi both have said, at different times, they thought Washington still might attempt to negotiate over other legislation — potentially involving prescription drug costs or new gun restrictions — but for now, the shadow of impeachment seems to have blotted out nearly everything else in the capital.
Trump's challenge about a vote also is an attempt to force Pelosi to truly test which of her moderate members, some of whom were elected last year in districts that Trump carried in 2016, are prepared to go on record in support of impeachment.
"Most of them, many of them, don't believe they should do it," Trump said on Friday. The president said that if Democrats move ahead, "I really believe they're going to pay a tremendous price at the polls."
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Plaffelvohfen
@Vaulk
@SkepticalOne
@AIofRI
@ZeusAres42
@Zombieguy1987
On Fox News, via "The Special Report with Bret Baier," a few moments ago.
During the Round Table discussion, the phrase "Political Civil War," was used.
And they are right, there is a Political Civil War, going on, between Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, along with the other participanting Liberals, who are (TALKING) about "Impeaching Trump?"
I was hoping that Pelosi, and Schiff, would publicly jump on the idea, about conducting an Impeachment Vote today, after the President, publicly stated that very idea.
And the Speaker of the House, stated that she was, "unmoved."
And its slowly becoming politically obvious, that apparently the Liberals, when it comes to the "Action, of conducting the Impeachment Vote," that the Liberals, will publicly Move on that ACTUAL, vote when the participating Liberals decide to?
Trump, played his publicity card, on the White House lawn, and the Impeachment seeking Liberals, balked at the notion.
Thanks Nancy Pelosi, your Liberal educational style, is the most impressive of all the Liberals, because you were unmoved?
Guess what Liberals, your NATIONWIDE, lack of action of conducting an Impeachment Vote today, speaks volumes, about how unmoving, your collective mindsets are, when it comes to the overall Public good, of this country, the United States of America.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 69%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 47%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
AlofRi
You said>>>Clinton, and HE was convicted about lying about one thing.
You need to check your history. President Clinton was indicted on 11, not one, criminal charges. After his presidency he was given a plea deal of a lifetime. One I have to say not one of us would have gotten.
On topic I argued before Trump took his stance of not compling with supeans until the impeachment was made official by bringing it to the floor for a vote, that the impeachment inquiery needs to be made official. The reason for this is as long as they keep running it the way they are it cuts out any other parties ability to call witness'. Therefore how can it be a fair assesment when we only get to hear from hand picked witness' from that the Democractic Party choose?
Pelosi must take this to the floor for a vote. If she wins then maybe there might be a proper inquiry. Until the standard and proper steps are taken I think the whole thing is just another stunt on the part of the DNC.
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: criminal charges    President Clinton   parties ability   plea deal of a lifetime  
  Relevant (Beta): 17%  
  Learn More About Debra
If you're trying to address AlofRi, you may want to press the reply icon under one of AlofRi's arguments so they will get a notification that you're addressing them specifically. If not, they may never know about the argument you just made.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: reply icon    AlofRi's arguments   notification   argument  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
This is a joke, right? It's just fine for a Dem candidate to solicit information from a foreign country about a rival political candidate. right? And it's OK for an outgoing administration to solicit information from a foreign country about a rival political candidate on behalf of his favored candidate.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I don't want the president to break the law, even if he claims his intentions are righteous. If Hunter Biden is being investigated, the president, or anybody in his staff should not have interfered by having any kind of discussions with Ukraine regarding the Biden's because that's not his duty as a president. If any democrats solicited information from a foreign country about a rival political candidate, then only the proper investigative entities should have investigated. Just because a rival candidate may have done it, it doesn't suddenly make it legal for our current president to violate the constitution. They are probably all guilty as far as I'm concerned, and if they are all proven guilty, they should be prosecuted accordingly. I never voted for any of them, so I why should I have to suffer if the constitution becomes invalid in the name of "getting to the bottom of corruption"?
You didn't get a notification about my earlier post because I only quoted a post by you, but I didn't press the "reply" icon under your post. I guess this site differentiates between quoting and replying. That's why you got a notification for this post.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 51%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 96%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 1.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: law    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://www.foxnews.com/person/s/antjuan-seawright
"Antjuan Seawright
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/antjuan-seawright-democrats-trump-2020-election
"Antjuan Seawright: Democrats, it's game on in the fight to defeat Trump. Never forget these four things"
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/antjuan-seawright-accessibility-affordability
"Antjuan Seawright: Here's the Democratic key to victory in 2020"
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/antjuan-seawright-thank-you-sen-ernest-fritz-hollings-for-your-service-and-leadership
"Antjuan Seawright: Thank you, Sen. Ernest 'Fritz' Hollings, for your service and leadership"
"Democrats need to investigate AND legislate -- It takes two to make the thing go right"
"2020 Democratic candidates here's some campaign advice: You're not Obama, so don't try to be"
The above are his, apparent growing list of "Opinion," articles?
From Mr. Antjuan Seawright on Twitter.
Another Liberal, apparently utilizing the current POTUS, as his individual platform, to push his rhetoric as well?
Just as Pelosi, Schumer, Biden, Green, Nadler, AOC, Harris, Booker, Schiff, and the other Impeachment talking, Liberal talking heads have?
2019, is the year of the, "Impeachment talking head's, Impeachment movement."
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 77%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.22  
  Sources: 21  
  Relevant (Beta): 29%  
  Learn More About Debra
He violated the constitution by classifying the transcripts of the conversation with Ukraine. Nowhere in the original text of constitution, or any subsequent legislation can we find any clause that gives a president the power to classify information without proper justification. It's worth noting that the original text of the constitution does not give a president the authority to classify anything, but unfortunately additional legislation has since granted presidents that power, but not without legal precedents for justification. He violated executive order 13526 (classification of National security information act of December 29, 2009). The reasons for classifying those transcripts do not fit the criteria for justifying the classification of the transcripts. The constitution, or any subsequent legislation does not grant the president the power to classify any and all information on a whim. If the president cannot explain to Congress why the disclosure of the classified information is a threat to national security, then it is a violation to have classified it to begin with. The fact that the president wants Ukraine and China to investigate the actions of Hunter Biden and his father is not a threat to national security, and the president has since gone public with that information, so it's obviously no kind of threat to anybody but the president and his reelection committee. If the president didn't do anything that violated the constitution, why did he want to classify the transcripts to begin with?
It's illegal to solicit anything from a foreign country. Even if it's information on a rival political candidate, so that is another violation of the constitution. And receiving money from foreign diplomats who stay at hotels the president owns is also a violation of the constitution. Threatening a possible civil war if he's impeached is a violation of the constitution. Trying to find the identity and question the "whistleblower" who came forward with the information of the inappropriately classified transcript is a violation of the constitution.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 61%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 49%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.58  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
Mark Levin, was talking about that on his show yesterday.
The Liberals, have created a mess for themselves.
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Mark Levin    show yesterday   Liberals   mess  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.64  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 32%  
  Learn More About Debra