Are they, through their Liberal, and Socialist Liberal political philosophy styles, making the United States a better place for the voting Public in an Equal and Fair manner?
Because I'm not seeing any equality or an fairness from them.
(But if you're pro Illegal Immigrant, pro Open Borders, pro Sanctuary City, pro Marijuana Legalization, pro non violent drug offender, or pro non violent offender, or pro criminal, and anti Trump, then those individual Liberals and Socialist Liberal politicians are the right talking head individuals for you then?
And none of them are making the United States, a better place, because they represent the problem causers of the U.S.
Illegal Immigrantion is a problem, because some of U.S. citizens have lost their lives to them, over the years, yet 22 million illegal immigrants, or aliens, are living in the United States illegally, and the Public, as a whole, has watched parts of the Border Barrier go up, but none of the Liberals, or the Socialist Liberals, have made any statements, stating that the Illegal Immigration problem, in the U.S., has been 1000% addressed, and the needs for those 300 Sanctuary Cities, are being done away with, and all of the legal citizens in those Sanctuary Cities, now have the Right to a proper Quality of Life, back to where it's supposed to be, because the illegal immigrants or aliens aren't infringing on the Rights of the legal citizens any longer.
Because the pro Illegal Immigrant supporting Liberals, and Socialist Liberals, were finally Fair and Equal to the rest of the Public, who weren't an illegal immigrant, or alien?
That's not "anti Freedom," at all, because that's what fair and equal Freedom looks like, and lives like, where the Rights of the legal citizen remains intact, in the face of the former Illegal Immigrantion issues.
And the Liberals, and Socialist Liberals, finally did the right thing as well, by recognizing the law abiding citizen, instead of holding the rights of non violent drug offenders, or the rights of the non violent offenders, or the rights of the criminals, over the rights of the law abiding citizens?
And collectively created laws, along with the Republicans, that equally and fairly recognized the Rights of the non violent drug offender, the non violent offenders, and criminals, and the law abiding citizens Equally and Fairly.
Because as of right now the, "Fair and Equal Citizenry Rights for all, are not being recognized at all?
And I'm wondering what Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Chuck Schumer, AOC, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, Al Green, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Gavin Newsom, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Beto O'Rourke, and Barack Obama, are waiting for?
Why aren't some of the former and current Liberals, and Socialist Liberals, along with the Republicans, aren't acting now, to fix the issues that have been infringing on the Rights, of the law abiding citizens for years now?
Because the voting Public, isn't seeing much Equality or Fairness, from the collective of Republicans, Liberals, and Socialist Liberals, who have taken the Oath of Office, and are in charge, and are supposed to be representing the Public as a whole, instead of some of the Special Interest groups, Causes, or Movements, that have ingrained themselves unto parts of the public, in an unfair, and unequal manner?
An Open Border is unfair and unequal to the Public.
The legalization of Marijuana, is unfair and unequal to the Public.
The 300 Sanctuary Cities, giving sanctuary to some of the 22 million illegal immigrants, or aliens, is unfair and unequal to the Public.
Giving the former non violent drug offenders, or the offenders, or criminals in general, the right to vote, is unfair, and unequal to the Public.
The gun violence crimes in general, are unfair and unequal to the Public.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
As it is, your lines seem completely disjointed, it is not clear what it is you are trying to convey, and each sentence being paragraphed shows lack of thought behind the comments. I will be frank, I never read your comments beyond the first couple of sentences, because it is never possible to determine where you are going with them.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: related sentences    central message.As   paragraphs   comments  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
It's a collective message to the Republicans, Liberals, and Socialist Liberals alike.
And their individual supporters as well, IE these supporters:
(But if you're pro Illegal Immigrant, pro Open Borders, pro Sanctuary City, pro Marijuana Legalization, pro non violent drug offender, or pro non violent offender, or pro criminal, and anti Trump, anti pro Public safety, anti pro gun law's, then those individual Liberals and Socialist Liberal politicians are the right talking head individuals for you then?)
I didn't leave any individual political bias filled talking points, out of the collective conversation.
I'm Pro Freedom, while some lament about other's being anti Freedom, at the cost to the overall Freedom of the Public.
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.14  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: individual supporters    pro gun law   Illegal Immigrant   collective message  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
You seem to take great pleasure in knocking every liberal, AND every liberal ideology every chance you get. Here is my liberal ideology, expressed by one of the best "expressers" in history:
"IF, by "liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who cares for the people, their health, their schools, jobs, civil rights and civil liberties, then, I'm proud to say I'm a liberal." JFK
The ideology of the current …. um … "administration" … (of temporary secretaries with the power to "follow orders, only, or be fired" :-( ), IS anything BUTT "liberal", of course.
Our last liberal President, when interviewing federal employees and judges told them "You do not work for ME, you work for the American people."
Therefor, I'm proud to say I agree with JFK on this subject, and I'm proud of our previous President, also. He made some mistakes, but, he WAS a "liberal" President not a dictator.
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 23%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 64%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: karl marx    dank kush      
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra