Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
You're being off topic.
And I don't have an alias.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Should same sex marriage be legal?
It's legalized, if a Liberal Politician is fishing for votes from some of the LGBTQ community?
A positive, is that at least some of the same sex couples have adopted babies, and have given those babies a home.
But in the same light of children, when two guys, or two ladies, get into a relationship, or get married, and can't biologically have kids, does that or does that not diminish society down, by maybe not having kids?
In some countries, if a couple have a boy, the boy is kept, but if the couple finds out, they are going to have a girl, the baby girl gets aborted?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Why are you being off topic?
"Any, like I said - good luck with your Bullsh*t trolling."
And what is going on with your foul language?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Unosmulier is a witness title I have given to a public union formed as likelihood between to woman as legal bond.
A witness does not have to speak in there native language to be a witness in a social verbal contract made with others in a society. If I don't see a marriage between a man and woman I cannot lie and say one takes place without risk.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Marriage licences come from a courthouse, it is legally binding.
The ceremony is just for konfety and plach.
You need not be a pedantic witness the ceremony to constitute Binvir or Unosmulier, with the exception that in states that currently ban same-sex marriage the zgoda is not considered to be nkwenye, but this should be self evident based on the memetic structure of any post-colonial nations.
I rest my case.
P.S. Please no more word salad. No one likes word salad. You don't make friends with word salad.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Don't worry, just like we muted your the last account we'll do the same with this one. Have fun with your dumb trolling TKDB now on a multi-account. It doesn't take a rocket scientists to work out you're both the same person."
"Any, like I said - good luck with your Bullsh*t trolling."
https://www.billprickett.com/brain-bubbles/encountering-holy-trolls
"These days, anyone who maintains a strong online presence knows about Internet Trolls—those who post comments solely intended to disrupt the conversation and/or upset those involved. Their tactics include shaming, name-calling, profanity, exaggerated claims and mindless rebuttals. They like the conflict and the attention when people challenge them."
"Whitney Phillips, a media studies and communications scholar has an entire book from her research about Trolls, This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things. She notes that Trolls tend to be male, and most often target women, people of color and LGBT people."
"Rumor has it there are secret, online sites made up exclusively for Trolls, designed to help and encourage them in their trouble-making quests. The Troll phenomenon is so prevalent, they’ve become a focus of psychological studies, defining and describing them in terms of a personality disorder, such as narcissism, sadism, racism, misogyny, homophobia and a Machiavellian need to manipulate. The experts agree the only way to respond to Trolls is NOT to respond. “Don’t feed the Trolls!”
"A Troll is different than a Spammer—those folks who repeatedly posts unrelated links in the comment section. Also, someone who disagrees with a subject doesn’t make them a Troll. So, the Tea Party Republican friend from high school, who only watches Fox News and listens exclusively to Rush Limbaugh is probably not a Troll. Nor is that Pentecostal aunt who thinks Ted Cruz is a godly Christian. When I get Trolls. I usually try to engage them...once, to determine if they’re trolling or just an aggressive, opinionated person. (I get those as well.)
Some reference material, in regards to your trolling commentary.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Ditto for the ladies.....
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Should same sex marriage be legal?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Should same sex marriage be legal?
FYI, a great description of yourself there. Were you currently looking in in the mirror when you copied and pasted this?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Has tried to prove god through math in the past (I'm not kidding) and most of what he says is utter nonsense
@TKDB
is the resident Sea Lion and spends his days Sea Lioning as one would expect from such a creature , he never argues a point or offers an opinion but copies and pastes others opinions instead, every statement he makes ends with a question mark and he nearly always asks " what has mr Dawkins got to say about his atheist rhetoric" etc etc
He hasn't mentioned Dawkins in a week I think his man crush with him is over
@RickeyD
Is one those religious Westboro type idiots who unfortunately the U S seem to produce at a fairly consistent rate, he seems to be one of those Bible Belt types who for "entertainment " reads bible verses to the family or when he wants to adventurous plays the jug much to the "joy" of his long suffering family
There are still others you haven't met yet so you're in for a treat.....BTW welcome to the site your contributions show you to be a welcome and much needed addition to the site
@Happy_Killbot
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Proof of your off topic troll running:
"Don't worry, just like we muted your the last account we'll do the same with this one. Have fun with your dumb trolling TKDB now on a multi-account."
"It doesn't take a rocket scientists to work out you're both the same person."
"Any, like I said - good luck with your Bullsh*t trolling."
And who is "We?"
Is there an Atheist dictatorship, around?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Proof of you off topic Troll running:
"is the resident Sea Lion and spends his days Sea Lioning as one would expect from such a creature,"
"he never argues a point or offers an opinion but copies and pastes others opinions instead,"
"every statement he makes ends with a question mark and he nearly always asks " what has mr Dawkins got to say about his atheist rhetoric"
"He hasn't mentioned Dawkins in a week I think his man crush with him is over."
Because you lamented over Dawkins:
Apparently this Atheist, is the #1 Atheist in the world?
https://thebestschools.org/features/top-atheists-in-the-world-today/
"1Peter Singer (b. 1946)
Singer is Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University and Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne, Australia. Born in Melbourne, he is one of the world’s most controversial philosophers. A Utilitarian in ethics, he believes that only sentience, not species membership, confers moral value. This leads him to ascribe greater moral value to healthy adult nonhuman mammals than to unborn, newborn, mentally defective, and comatose humans. Singer has written: “The notion that human life is sacred just because it is human life is medieval.” We believe his blend of philosophical sophistication, extremism, and high public profile makes him the most formidable living atheist in the world."
"Books: Animal Liberation, Practical Ethics, The Expanding Circle, Rethinking Life and Death, Writings on an Ethical Life, Unsanctifying Human Life, and The Life You Can Save "
Are you a part of the "We?"
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
You've just proved everything I said about you
*****Because you lamented over Dawkins:
What are you even talking about you idiotic creature?
How did I "lament " exactly bet you cannot answer yet again?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
BTW our good friend @Plaffelvohfen kindly left you a Butt -Hurt report to fill out and just to clarify if none of the sections serve the reason for your Butt-Hurt you can use a separate sheet ......I also offered you a crate of frozen fish of your choice as I know Sea Lions love them I’m deeply upset you haven’t specified the type you want or what location are you a Northern Pacific Sea Lion by any chance?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yeah...true but it is only one page.:)
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@John_C_87
Has tried to prove god through math in the past (I'm not kidding) and most of what he says is utter nonsense
I proved the numbers 400, 11, and 500 as an axiom could be confused by any-one easily with a word GOD to which is re-established every day...….
400 has a historic written character of G, 11 has a history in written character of O, while the 500 has a history character of D.
Take the nonsense challenge. Which choice is the sensible word GOD in this complete representation?
(A.) 400,11.500 (B.) GOD (C.)GOD (D.) NONE
HINT: It can only be nonsense when numbers and letters are not labeled in a basic way which tells them apart...
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
The Sea Lion does say some things that are truly hilarious the tragedy being he actually thinks they are pearls of wisdom
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
What does "#1 Atheist" mean? #1 at what? Atheism is not a contest; it is just a system of views.
I personally do not resonate with Dawkins' crusade. In my opinion, religion is not relevant enough - or worthy enough, for that matter - to take it seriously, and the best approach to criticising it is to throw short dismissive comments, making it clear that seriously discussing fantasy worlds is beneath you.
Dawkins, on the other hand, takes it overly seriously, and I would even say that he has become a zealot at this point. He makes picking fights with religious people one of his primary behavioral modes, and he has let his emotions get the best of him more than once.
Dawkins' activities demonstrate well how not to criticise religion.
You should not assume that Dawkins is somehow representative of the average atheist. Most of us do not pay much heed to religion; it is simply not a noticeable part of our lives.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
That a person does not know, and is not asked directly in a legal sense if they feel or have felt threatened as a witness, in a requested testimony to a malpractice of law. It is criminally irony as it is taking place in a forum of debate in which the illegal act of same gender marriage is recognized in writing, and a witness is bantered, bullied, and ignored by refusal of confirmation to the public account of a witness for stating a basic truth.
@MayCaesar
TKDB is an uncreatable witness...…..In direct contradiction to notification of a constitutional right insured by basic laws with legal precedent there is a insistence to take part in a public witness tampering. @MayCaesar By the powers entrust to me by those who request a public witness do you MayCaesar object to the legal unions created by Binivir and UnosMulier? Speak now for forever hold your peace so help you affirmation or GOD?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@smoothie
It is very relevant a witness must be give a clear and general legal guideline to be observed in a public likelihood. In the case of mixed genders it is a simple kiss that demonstrates the willingness to have children. Meaning a citizen will be created between the couple and added to the Nation. This does not exist for a couple of the same gender and the kiss is not a demonstration of reproduction which would be a means to create a citizen as united state between all men and woman.
Obstruction of a witness on an official document can be a serious issue even when the witness does not understand the importance of there place in the likelihood being observed. Sadly you do not have a choice of relevance on a moment to voice legal objection. Some one can base a objection of religious ground without knowing full detail. Again do you object to Binivir or UnosMulier speak now or forever hold your piece. A legal public likelihood's creation insures United State publicly can and could have had representation state and federally on a legal level. Failing to answer with yes and no means you have no legal objection to this public change made on venue to liberty.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra