Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
Dee said:
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 16%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
He just constantly flip flops on all issues.
https://www.presidentflipflops.com/
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.54  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: flip flops    policies   map    
  Relevant (Beta): 54%  
  Learn More About Debra
***** Ah the racist stalker is back accusing me of bipolar .....irony
  Considerate: 16%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 79%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: racist stalker    irony   nbsp    
  Relevant (Beta): 68%  
  Learn More About Debra
*****This is informed consent
It actually the golden rule that is presuming one asks one do they consent to sexual act before enacting it ......You do that do you?
  Considerate: 46%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: golden rule    consent   sexual act   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
Informed consent is not just sexual, it applies to all components of human interaction.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: components of human interaction    break   consent    
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
***** I think I broke you... You might want to take a break or something...
Ha, Ha says the guy who admitted he’s irrational as he said Trump was a psychopath and now he’s sulking
****Informed consent is not just sexual, it applies to all components of human interaction.
Go put your head in the fridge and calm the f—k down .......Who knows P might give you 2 “thumbs up “
  Considerate: 20%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: components of human interaction.Informed consent    part of any moral code   consent   break  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Dee said: Oh man.. I really did break you.
https://phys.org/news/2016-08-presidential-candidates-psychopaths-good.html
You mentioned sexual in your comment before this one that was... anything but coherent.
Look, at this point we are just going to have to agree to disagree because this discussion went off the rails a long time ago.
F*** Trump and everything he stands for. Not because it is rational to do so, but because I decided to oppose his presidency.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 23%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.42  
  Sources: 3  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: components of human interaction.Informed consent    part of any moral code   long time   consent  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 52%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.3  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
Fair points , I wonder have you said the same to my opponents?
At this stage the whole site may as well have ago , I reposted my original comment from the start of this thread as in it is perfectly rational for me to intensely dislike Trump going on what I know of this man I'm told this is irrational by a guy who claimed Trump was also a psychopath.
I defend my position and did not resort to insult until K launched into a personal attack and he doesn't like it when he gets it back.
Tell you what go to the beginning of the thread and read both sides and tell me how I'm in error , I've asked several to do so but the mob mentality has deemed such a no , no all because of sheer intellectual cowardice
  Considerate: 52%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Fair points    personal attack   start of this thread   whole site  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
Nobody has to win the debate, especially when the debate has deteriorated to such an unsalvageable state. It is okay to withdraw and let the less mature opponent have their victory dance.
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 65%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: pages of people    mature opponent   insults   debate  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
I agree with you that it can make sense to hate Trump just like it makes sense to love him... Would you agree with that?
It started to go sour when you kept repeating that you "demonstrated" that emotions are in themselves rational... I'm sorry but you did not.
Just to quote the first time "You may believe emotions stand in opposition to rational thought, but scientific evidence suggests the opposite is true. It is impossible to be rational without being emotional. While emotions can overwhelm rationality, rationality cannot exist without emotions."
The only "demonstration" you made was to quote Greenspan from 2002, an excerpt from a Huffpost article and the story of Elliot the patient of Damasio. But his work so far (Somatic Marker Hypothesis), although very interesting indeed, is just a proposition with flaws, which may yet be addressed mind you, but nothing has been "demonstrated" yet... The insistence (and the condescending tone) about having demonstrated that it is impossible to be rational without being emotional when it clearly hasn't been, was starting to be annoying... And when this was mentioned (that it was annoying), you started with the ad hominem...
That's just the sad state of things...
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.68  
  Sources: 4  
  Relevant (Beta): 56%  
  Learn More About Debra
•••••••I agree with you that it can make sense to hate Trump just like it makes sense to love him... Would you agree with that?
Actually what was demonstrated was an individual who actually couldn’t come to a decision without overthinking eveything because he lacked emotions , do you disagree with that?
***The insistence (and the condescending tone) about having demonstrated that it is impossible to be rational without being emotional when it clearly hasn't been, was starting to be annoying...
But it was clearly demonstrated in this particular case do you deny this?
****And when this was mentioned (that it was annoying), you started with the ad hominem...
Here is where you get disingenuous ,it wasn’t “mentioned” K launched into a vicious attack and indeed said he spoke for others on the site who agreed with his attack which I presume means you also , this is the cowardice I speak of.
I always thought you were a pretty fair guy but clearly that is not the case K launched the first ad hominem and you turn that into “ when he mentioned” , you dare not like others criticise K on such , shame on you , you call me out on my reaction which I accept but turn K’s ad hominien into “when he mentioned”. If you agree with the guy that’s fine but don’t excuse bad behaviour in one and condemn another ,you know I’m right on this but I don’t expect you to accept it and that’s your choice.
****That's just the sad state of things...
Yes the sad state of things remains that I presented evidence to support my claims you and k don’t like it ( I have more) so instead of debating and proving it wrong instead you go on a collective witch hunt , so what we are left with is you think I should accept your subjective opinion on the matter I don’t as I find neither of your arguments persuasive in the least , now you may move on or not , but as I suspect you’s won’t, so be it
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.92  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
You’re right , the debate was pretty interesting to a point but it went off on far too many tangents as we all did. Your intervention is timely and welcome
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 46%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: debate    intervention   point   tangents  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
***** You said to me once the following words: "your post was excellent and your honesty is totally refreshing and unique when it comes to such sites where people rarely admit they may have been in error. keep up the good work ."
In my opening piece I stated an intense dislike of Trump is rational going on the information I have , I was told intense dislike was “irrational” which is absolute nonsense.
. I asked you to read the thread and prove me wrong regards this and I’ve asked others but not one person will dare admit K fired off the first insult , this is grossly unfair to say the least.
I’ve actually enjoyed exchanges with P and K in the past , I merely asked K a question in a courteous manner and everyone rushes to his defence
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 40%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.18  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: basic knowledge    President Trump   solid evidence   fact of legal precedent  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
K said that he understood how some people might come to that conclusion and frankly, at some point later on, I did too... If that triggers you that much, those people might be right after all...
"I have further supporting evidence." ... Then show it, link us to actual studies or something with hard scientific content... All you did was stating, not demonstrating anything, and still haven't... From all the research I did, I can only come to the conclusion that the jury is still out...
You say you thought I was a fair guy, why? Because we agree on a lot of issues?? That doesn't shield anyone from warranted criticism...
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well then here is my side of the story:
While I may be to blame for dropping the first- ad-hominem, I was not the first to abandon civil discourse, as prior to this multiple straw men and simple unwillingness to try and understand my argument were never truly made. After multiple instances of "I don't understand what you are saying", and "why would you think this?" When I have clearly stated that "This is what I am saying" and "I don't think that" you continue to repeat this rhetoric, it's get very annoying very fast, besides being condescending and intellectually lazy.
In particular, you said:
I politely responded:
Shortly after you said:
To which I reiterated:
In the very next statement you reply with a copy-paste of above:
And I retort:
To me, these seem to indicate that you have no interest in learning and understanding my point of view. It is as if you expect me to attack your points of view, which the majority of I don't disagree with, only the single detail which is the ultimate question of this thread. To make matters worse, you admit openly that you don't understand my reasons and logic, even after I and others have made so many attempts describing the same thing, which for the sake of discussion I will dub "does x = 7 because I feel so?" problem.
Remember, I was the first mover here, in that I made a single sentence statement which many people agreed with, albeit with some semantic differences. It is my opinion, that these semantic differences may have played a role in the lack of understanding and comprehension, and it is on me for failing to address them earlier, in particular the way that rational thought which is based on an assumption can only be as good as the truth in that assumption.
Throughout the rest of this dumpster fire, I never felt that my base claim was ever really attacked or for that matter addressed, and the longer it went on the worse it got, until we were all openly engaged in continuous ad-hominem attacks and completely incoherent discourse.
Even in telling your story here there are many instances where it seems like you want us to attack your views, and seem surprised where we are all on the defense of our own. The problem with this is that I don't disagree with most of what you provided, to sum up a few:
- Emotions and logic are intimately connected in human thought.
- Donald Trump is rude and dishonest, and a failure as a president.
- Emotions have pragmatic value in terms of survival and social unity.
- The decision making components of the human brain communicate with the emotional centers, severing this connection produces a person who has difficulty making decisions.
- Emotions have played a powerful role in geopolitics and global conflict.
- AI thought is nothing like human thinking, to the point it is debatable if it is thought at all.
While all of these points are perfectly valid, none of them exclude the possibility or disprove the claim I have been making to the "does x = 7 because I feel so?" problem.I think that we have just been talking past each other for the last 4 1/2 pages of argument, and I completely agree that there is no reason to further continue this discussion.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.14  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 57%  
  Learn More About Debra
Believe it or not I enjoyed the conversation up to a point and I agree we are talking past each other , maybe face to face this would be resolved because differences would be sorted out quickly and effectively , I agree there is no reason to continue you may have the last word if you wish
  Considerate: 97%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: face    conversation   last word   point  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
***** K said that he understood how some people might come to that conclusion and frankly, at some point later on, I did too... If that triggers you that much, those people might be right after all...
Actually it “doesn’t” trigger me I was merely pointing out your duplicity in failing to call it an Ad Hominien
I already have.
Why would I? You have presented zilch to support your position not one study , link or quote
*****All you did was stating, not demonstrating anything, and still haven't... From all the research I did, I can only come to the conclusion that the jury is still out...
Really , yet you’ve demonstrated nothing to support your position and still haven’t?
*****You say you thought I was a fair guy, why?
Or unwarranted attacks
You may have the last words if you wish or preferably just move on
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: fair guy    nbsp   Ad Hominien   unwarranted attacks  
  Relevant (Beta): 59%  
  Learn More About Debra
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 26%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: worst president    US history   mockery of western values   Donald Trump  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I agree wholeheartedly and I’m still truly astonished that this clown ever became president of a great nation, I hope to f—k he doesn’t make a second term that would be a really hard medicine to take for decent Americans
  Considerate: 49%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: president of a great nation    second term   clown   hard medicine  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
If at some point the majority of Americans start agreeing that Trump's actions are worse than, say, construction of internment camps for Japanese people, or lobbying the interests of slavers, or genociding the indigenous population... Then this country will be in a huge trouble, opening wide the door towards human right abuses unprecedented in the modern Western world.
Luckily, I do not think this will happen. Just like with every other president, sensationalism will end soon once this guy has left the office, and the next president will be seen as the worst in the US history, regardless of who he/she is. This is how the political process in democracies works: the present is always seen as the worst, regardless of what it is.
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: worst leader    construction of internment camps   series of brutal communist leaders   Japanese people  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
For example, there is the whole Russian collusion thing, I am now convinced that Trump didn't collude with Russia, but rather was a lucky benefactor.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
History is hard to predict. Woodrow Wilson was arguably the worst president in the history of the US from the economical perspective, responsible for a very large list of economical and social problems existing to this day - yet history remembers him fairly well, most likely because of the outcome of the First World War. Trump has accomplished something similar - he brokered the peace between the two Koreas that seemed impossible for the last ~65 years, despite countless efforts of multiple South Korean and US presidents to broker it - and this alone can already add a bright tone to his description in the history books of the future, regardless of how some of his controversial statements and policies are going to be judged.
History also remembers warmly some awful tyrants, such as Alexander the Great, Oliver Cromwell or Peter the Great. There really is no recipe to be remembered poorly or warmly by historians and the general population, and a lot depends on minor unpredictable factors. For example, it is almost certain that, had Soviet Union sided with Nazi Germany in the war all the way through (of which there was a very high chance at the time), nowadays calling people "Stalin" on the Internet in order to attack them would be much more common, than calling them "Hitler".
How Trump will be remembered is unknown, but that he will be seen as the worst president in the US history is highly unlikely, especially considering the competition. Think also about what is likely to be seen as a bigger deal, say, in the year 2100: the fact that Trump has brokered peace between Koreas and pulled a number (even if not that large) of soldiers out of the Middle East, or the impeachment or "fake news" things? People remember things impacting the world as a whole well, and do not remember specific political details that much.
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
I would want him to be the worst in US history, because that would imply that all future presidents will be better. The book I mentioned, which is an inside look at the white house from the perspective of a white house top official, looks incredibly bleak. What has been covered in the media is arguably being very lenient on him, but it is hard to say because most of the details are still not in the public.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: white house    Korean peace deal   inside look   perspective of a white house  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Interesting piece , you I believe are Russian if I’m wrong on this apologies , I just wanted to ask how do you view Stalin as in a tyrant or a great leader? I read recently that Stalins popularity rating is fairly high in Russia mainly because of his role in world war 2
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 48%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Interesting piece    Stalins popularity rating   great leader   apologies  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
Maybe yes, maybe not. In any case, this is farther than anyone has come regarding brokering the peace between the Koreas, and it is unlikely that history will forget it.
"Better" and "worse" are subjective categories. Given the current pool of the candidates, almost every possible replacement for Trump seems like a major downgrade to me - but many people have a different opinion. In any case, I would prefer the actual villains to be at the bottom of the historical rankings, rather than just awkward and incompetent folks - but, again, I have no say in how history portraits prominent individuals. I do know that political details usually get lost in the process, and people mostly remember the major events standing out of the ordinary, though.
@Dee
Well, when it comes to me, I consider Stalin to be the third worst nation leader to ever walk this planet, after Pol Pot and Mao (and followed by Lenin and Hitler). But many Russian dissidents, caught in the heat of the moment, consider Putin to be the worst ruler in the Russian history. Now, Putin definitely is not something to celebrate - but to see him as being worse than Stalin, Lenin, Peter or Ivan IV is impossible virtually from any rational standpoint.
Stalin is quite popular in Russia, mostly, I would say, because of the Russian cultural tendency to respect strongmen, as well as due to the recent historical revisionism initiated by Putin, who himself is quite nostalgic for Soviet Union. But mostly, I would say, Russians view Stalin about the same way as Chinese view Mao: he had his good sides, but his bad sides were bad enough to not wish for anyone like him ever again.
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Thats fascinating , it’s remarkable the respect of “strong men “ as in its almost like a protector father figure. You’re spot on Putin could never be viewed in the same light. I wonder how Trump will be seen in 50 years time?
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 64%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.14  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: strong men    years time   protector father figure   respect  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: book         
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
My guess is Trump will generally be viewed as a fairly unremarkable president, same as someone like Gerard Ford, about which nobody seems to remember anything, other than the fact that he had the same last name as the founder of the Ford automobile company. But, again, it is hard to predict these things.
Putin though, I am almost certain, will not be treated well by the history books. The secret to remaining popular long after one's death as a dictator seems to be to create a system that will live after one's death, like the one Stalin or Kim Il Sung created. Putin's power, on the other hand, seems to rest purely on his personality cult and a momentary appeal to the nationalist branch of the Russian population. Once he is gone, his successor will likely rapidly reform the system and start talking about how he/she inherited Putin's mess (similar to how Luzhkov, once a very popular mayor of Moscow, quickly became the scapegoat for all problems in Moscow after he did not share something with Putin and was replaced), and the public opinion will quickly change. Decades later, I doubt anyone will remember Putin positively, with the exception of a small minority of nationalists remembering his expansionist activities.
Again though, these things are highly unpredictable. Perhaps Putin and Trump will be seen as the best leaders in the history of mankind 1,000 years from now - highly unlikely, but not completely impossible. After all, a simple carpenter from a province in Rome managed to become the most popular man in the history of the planet, by a product of chance.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Putin's power    popular mayor of Moscow   Putin's mess   simple carpenter  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@MayCaesar Be careful about talking about Putin. One or more of the last people to do that ended up disappearing mysteriously. Joke btw.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Putin's power    popular mayor of Moscow   Putin's mess   simple carpenter  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well, I am merely giving him advice. If he wants to be portrayed well in history books, he will have to ramp up his game.
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 35%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.18  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: history books    game   advice   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yes I think you’re right regards Trump and how he will be perceived historically and also about Putin, there’s something very chilling about Putin he comes across to me as a man totally devoid of feelings for others.
I read an interesting piece in the Guardian which claims Russians are still attempting to recover from the trauma of the Stalin era and that the movie about Stalin ( I liked it some hated it ) was banned ...... https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/07/russia-stalin-putin-guilt-victims
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.74  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: trauma of the Stalin era    interesting piece   Putin   man  
  Relevant (Beta): 40%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.18  
  Sources: 19  
  Relevant (Beta): 14%  
  Learn More About Debra