Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
***** You have the right to your opinion,
I know Wow ! Thanks for that
***but you don't have the right to your own facts.
No one “owns facts” some like you deny them thought
****You need to go read Philemon.
No I don’t
***** I will never agree with you,
I know , yet facts are facts
**** so don't bother.
I’m actually not , I was just correcting you ....again .......What? Oh you’re welcome
  Considerate: 43%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 79%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: own facts.No    facts   nbsp   Thanks  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 46%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 78%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: own facts.No    nbsp   facts   Thanks  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
Leave me alone.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 12%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 31%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 77%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Dee    harassment   troll    
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
You replied with couth elsewhere so I thought I would engage here.
I still do not know what you view as an objective moral tenet.
Listen to this and you might change the way you define that term.
You used the first commandment as an example.
Concider that it is impossible to successfully order a person to love anything that they do not know.
It becomes even harder when the love is to go to what is described to be really vile by any moral standard.
Regards
DL
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.94  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: objective moral tenet.Listen    first commandment   way   term  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 57%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.38  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: objective moral tenet.Listen    first commandment   way   moral standard.RegardsDL  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
I thought you were leaving the site never to come back ? At least you’re predictable as in you change your mind every 5 minutes . A couple of weeks ago you claimed to be Atheist , you also claimed your support for Bernie Sanders now you’re back wtth Trump .......The opposite of what you say always seems to be the truth do you see a pattern here?
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: couple of weeks    Bernie Sanders   wtth Trump   Atheist  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
Take the log out of your eye.
Regards
DL
  Considerate: 33%  
  Substantial: 69%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: true Christian    false teacher   liar   Bible  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
What is fairly likely, however, is that, regardless of the AI programming, it will have a very strong incentive to get as much power over humanity and other AIs as possible. No matter what sophisticated purpose ultimately drives the AI, the more power it has, the better it will be able to fulfil its purpose. This means that even a very benevolent AI will still strive to be a dictator and to subdue humanity.
Which is why I think that soon after we create an AI, we will lose control over our lives. Which might not be a bad thing: depending on the exact scenario, an AI controlling our society may be strongly beneficial to us. Nonetheless, it is a one-way road. In my opinion, we should focus more not on how to make an AI as harmless as possible, but on how to make an AI period.
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: lot of things    stop button problem.Now   reward function   paperclip maximizers  
  Relevant (Beta): 22%  
  Learn More About Debra
However you can also do it by passing a value into the next node, where the value passed from one to the next is determined by the output of the last, in this case instead of picking a random path it adds a value for each sequential node based on whatever that learned value is, so A might get 100, B 600, C 300, and then the process repeats for the next set of nodes and values. This type is deterministic and will always output the same value for a given structure.
There are also methods that use a combination of the two.
I'm not convinced we will ever have to deal with an AI overlord, specifically because we are probably going to evolve ourselves at around the same time that an AI would feasibly be capable of doing that. Humans will have created the AI, and presumably will be able to control it to some extent should it start behaving in ways that we don't like. We have clawed and fought our way to the pinnacle of our capabilities, such that producing such AI's is possible.
What is more likely is that humans will use machines for power over other people, and I think that our current path to AI development is not to make fully fledged completely autonomous agents but rather to create dependent semi-autonomous AI's that rely on humans to know what they need to do.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: example path A    neural networks   random components   type of algorithm  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
What I meant is randomness not just in the output of each neuron (which is an inherent feature of all neural network models I have worked with), but in the input as well. That is, the sensory input the AI receives must have artificial uncertainties in it, and also artificial uncertainties must be introduced into the functions it uses to evaluate the output.
I cannot easily explain it, but if you read some papers on neural networks, you can get the gust of it. It is somewhat related to the overtraining and overfitting problems which plague all neural network models to this day (and are possibly unsolvable completely), but in a more general sense. In a way, neural network needs to experience more variation in inputs than its actual sensors allow it to process, hence there should be mechanism generating "fake data" and making the AI adjust to it.
Something similar needs to be done with neural networks learning on simulated data, but applied to real data: since real data has some inherent noise, artificial noise needs to be introduced into the simulated data, otherwise overfitting and, sometimes, overtraining problems occur. But an actual AI deals with a much more complex input than modern neural networks, hence it needs more noise introduced at more different points of its decision-making process, and noise is intrinsically random.
I am not sure if an AI will become our overlord, but it will have a strong incentive to try, at least. Of course, it is also possible that the AI will not be a completely separate creature, and, instead, humans will be somewhat integrated with the same technology as the one the AI is based on - in which case the AI really will be just an extension of us, and it will do our bidding as much as we will do its.
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra