To begin, this first round I would like to be used as presenting definitions of important terms and acceptance of those terms in order to avoid semantics debates. I will automatically accept any definitions of new terms my opponent wishes to present in the first round that I don't present. By accepting this debate, you also accept the definitions I present here and also accept the rule of not posting any actual arguments in the first round. I will present my opening arguments in the second round as will my opponent. Do not post a rebuttal in the second round. Please only post supporting evidence and arguments for your position; do not try to specifically refute my arguments yet. The third round will be your rebuttal to my opening arguments where you can refute them from the second round as well as closing statements.
So that we both have the burden of proof, this will be a debate where we each take positive claim positions. I will take the position of "non-hierarchical class structures are better for learning outcomes of the students." My opponent is taking the position of "Hierarchical class structure is better for the learning outcomes of the students" that way we both have the burden of proof.
Now, the definition I am going to give of the term in my title shall be as follows: A hierarchical class structure is one in which the teacher is leading the class, lecturing them, and little to no inter-student teaching. So students are either not teaching one another or doing so very little: most of the teaching comes from the teacher themselves. Thus my position is that I am arguing a class structure in which a teacher takes on more of a role of a moderator and lets the students teach one another, is better for learning outcomes. So the teacher steps in basically if a student presents something false or feels the need to clarify.
For the term "learning outcomes" the following are examples of measuring that(but these aren't all possible examples, and it will be up to voters if we provide evidence that is relevant) :
1) The ability for them to recall the material after a certain amount of time from studying(of course the higher likelihood of them to recall after a longer period of time is a stronger argument)
2) The average of how well they perform in the class(the percent grade)
3) The average of how well they perform on tests(the percentage they get right on the test)
If you want to clarify any possible terms that will come up in this debate, feel free to do so in this round. If you have none to clarify, you may simply say something like "I accept these conditions" in the first round.
Note to voters: Since the first round is being used in this manner, do not take the first round into account for any of the criteria for who wins. Only use it as a reference to make sure neither side is trying to change definitions of terms they agreed to before beginning the debate and if they actually presented evidence and/or logic supporting the positions I outlined we each are taking here.
"Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal."
-Albert Camus, Notebook IV
Debra AI Prediction
Debate Type: Traditional Debate
Voting Format: Formal Voting
Opponent:
Rounds: 3
Time Per Round: 48 Hours Per Round
Voting Period: 72 Hours
Status: Not Accepted (Post Argument To Accept The Debate)
Forfeited
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments (1) Comments (5)
Arguments
-Albert Camus, Notebook IV
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: rules    acceptance   definitions   round  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra