Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 70%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: man    earth   ignorance    
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 37%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: mo    debate   email   world  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 33%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.94  
  Sources: 3  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: humane society    vet   nbsp    
  Relevant (Beta): 35%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 44%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.14  
  Sources: 3  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: way    things   nbsp    
  Relevant (Beta): 39%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 41%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.84  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: deep state doo doo    straw   camels   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 65%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 44%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: none         
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Steal your money
Then they break your heart
Lonesome sue, she's in love with ol'Sam
Take him from the fire into the frying pan
She just keeps on trying
And she smiles when she feels like crying
On and on, On and on, On and on
Sits alone in the moonlight
Saw his woman kiss another man
So he takes a ladder
Steals the stars from the sky
Puts on sinatra and starts to cry
He just keeps on trying
And he smiles when he feels like crying
On and on, On and on, On and on
It can make you feel so bad
But if you know it, show it
Hold on tight
Don't let her say: Goodnight
And my toes in the sand
My woman's left me for the some other man
Aw, but I don't care
I'll just dream and stay tan
Toos up my heart to see where it lands
I just keep on trying
And I smile when I feel like dying
On and on
On and on
On and on
On and on
On and on
On and on
On and on
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: nbsp    woman kiss   ol'SamTake   first time  
  Relevant (Beta): 7%  
  Learn More About Debra
Steal your money
Then they break your heart
Lonesome sue, she's in love with ol'Sam
Take him from the fire into the frying pan
She just keeps on trying
And she smiles when she feels like crying
On and on, On and on, On and on
Sits alone in the moonlight
Saw his woman kiss another man
So he takes a ladder
Steals the stars from the sky
Puts on sinatra and starts to cry
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: nbsp    ol'SamTake   onPoor ol   woman kiss  
  Relevant (Beta): 29%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: nbsp         
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
Also I think that your YouTuber has been peer reviewed enough seeing as you're not even trying to defend him now defending the accuracy of his videos from the errors I've pointed out. He's a random YouTuber with no known qualifications so your appeals to his expertise because he claims to have PHD are false. His experiments are poor, amateurish, biased and anti-science as he seems to have given no thought to his methodology and not understand a lot of what he's doing.
Seeing as we've now looked at and confirmed that your YouTuber's experiments have no validity, it's actually his experiments which meet his own definition of scientism as "The improper usage of science or scientific claims. this means making a scientific sounding statement where there isn't empirical evidence to justify such a statement". I mean hell I've literally pointed out him making unjustified claims based on no evidence in my last few posts which you've been unable to defend.
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.66  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 71%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: hollow thats    head   earth   dude  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 24%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 56%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 65%  
  Substantial: 46%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: moves    argument   point   acts  
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 1.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: conga o         
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
Edit: If you want to know more a great YouTube channel to check out is Professor Stick.
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: great YouTube channel    guys   people   earth  
  Relevant (Beta): 28%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://twitter.com/Zombieguy19871
Taxation is always theft
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.14  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: great YouTube channel    Professor Stick.That's Flat Earther logic   guys   people  
  Relevant (Beta): 28%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://twitter.com/Zombieguy19871
Taxation is always theft
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.14  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: great YouTube channel    Professor Stick.That's Flat Earther logic   guys   people  
  Relevant (Beta): 28%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 67%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: desperate attempt    modern technological age   fatal flaw   bible  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
@AlexOland
You don't really understand. We are not proving him wrong. He is proving incapable to undertake a task of scientific study. To address the situation billatard if shown empirical proof the earth is round could not display an ability to make that possible understood to himself clearly. That ability is need to explain complex issue to others so the objective of result can be found consistently.
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.8  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: situation billatard    empirical proof   complex issue   ability  
  Relevant (Beta): 57%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 73%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: genuine sympathy    sad example of humanity      
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: part of the overall requirements    world   ball   balance of truth  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 50%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: smarty pants         
  Relevant (Beta): 69%  
  Learn More About Debra
For example, I can say, "2+2=3 because cheese is tasty", and then, "2+2=3 because I say so". If I constantly shift between these two, then the opponents can never have enough time to properly attack one of them, and as a result I never have a reason to concede the argument.
I am starting to think that there must be some mathematical model of a proper logical debate developed. So in such cases the debater is not allowed to hop between multiple arguments, unless the currently debated argument is resolved.
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
This was what I was trying to do, actually. I never responded to any of his other points unless he either proves me wrong or admits that he cannot prove me wrong. The problem with this is that he took neither option. He either ignored me alltogether or marked my arguments as "funny".
I am really curious as to what exactly, from a psychological standpoint, causes these people to act this way. Because it is not just a matter of clinging to the idea that the earth is flat, they cannot accept that they were wrong about anything at all. They claim that they are rationalists but when you actually show that they are wrong, they resort to: "nuh-uh" for an answer.
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 69%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 45%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: favour of a spherical earth    posters   forum   evidence  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
I would classify it as simply intellectual immaturity. Many of us, especially those of us talented in some regards, have gone through the period of refusing to believe that we can be wrong. I have a strong natural affinity at mathematics, and back in high school, whenever I would make a mistake on a test, I would try very hard to convince myself that I had somehow someone else to blame for it: the test makers, the teacher, the grader, or whoever else.
Most of us grow up in this regard. We get used to the idea that we can be terribly wrong about something. Even more so, those of us who pursue various research avenues soon learn that being wrong about something is a default state of things. It often takes us many years of research full of mistakes and missteps, before we get a glimpse at what the truth is.
But some never do. Especially those who heavily invest a lot of emotional energy and time into some idea. Even if that idea crumbles before their very eyes, they will defend it to the end, as the thought of a major part of their entire world view crumbling is too painful for them to bear.
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: strong natural affinity    high school   various research avenues   lot of emotional energy  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://twitter.com/Zombieguy19871
Taxation is always theft
http://www.atheistrepublic.com/
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Ampersand
Understanding the earth is a sphere and explain to a person how to establish the shape by scientific method are not the same principle.
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.8  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: favour of a spherical earth    scientific method   posters   forum  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Zombieguy1987
The logic would instantly only fails if there is life on the planets. Instead we must look and the horizon to measure an arc 360 degrees around use it is the equality of the degree of arc which determines the geometric shape of a sphere and size.
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.64  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 64%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.76  
  Sources: 3  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: debate    much effort   green cheese   moon  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
Did you really ask for empirical scientific evidence?!?! Science isn't concerned with empiricism, it's concerned with objective evidence!!!! Empiricism has no place in science, it's better suited for fairy tales.
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: empiricism    Science   fairy tales   place  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 11%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 67%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: mate         
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
Every single text was very very interesting and heartful...!!
I was enjoying with this text.
Thank you so much for sharing the info.
Thanks
Rosa Walton
Professional Technologist & Gamer.
  Considerate: 96%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 70%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: single     Thanks   Rosa Walton   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 6%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 34%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: moons gravity    Scientists   Earth   bulge  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
That's not due to the moon's gravity but the earth's rotation.
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 46%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: moon's gravity    earth's rotation      
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
It is due to gravity as motion, the earth’s gravitation motion and moon’s gravity as motion effect the elasticity and modulation aspects of gravity directly, the effect is displayed on the earth’s surface as the shape of the moon effects reverberation as an energy. The Earths rotation is created between two forms, type of gravity, mass and energy gravity, energy and the gravitation of mass transfer heat in different ways as the presumption of gravitation itself in one direction in motion. Yet energy as a force moves multiple direction.
The Earths rotation is creating the movement of a frozen act of elasticity by bulge. rotation is creating movement of the bulge as a modulation, you are not wrong by know popular detailing and observation. However, a Forth law of motion can describe both types of gravity as the motion of modulation, elasticity and reverberation.
One mathematic proof would read. For all gravity there exist motion as elasticity, modulation, and reverberation. This proof covers the act of motion created by gravity as one kind of motion and that alone,
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra