@ZeusAres42

You mean control the conversation, to play your typical game.

But I'll save you, from your controlling self.

And answer your question my way, and my answer is still:
I'm still pro Life, pro Child, pro Adoption, pro Family, pro Community, and pro Humanity, despite your fictionally based teachings, or questions.

And I'm not changing my responses to suit your controlling nature. 

@ZeusAres42

https://www.verywellfamily.com/termination-of-a-desired-pregnancy-for-medical-reasons-2371777

"Terminating a Desired Pregnancy for Medical Reasons or Poor Prognosis"

You could be self proactive, and interview a lady who has dealt with the above real life situation, and maybe (with her permission,) share some of her testimony with the forum?  

I'm pro Life, pro Adoption, pro Child, pro Community, and pro Humanity.

@Dee

Are you pro Abortion and pro Criminal?

And if you are pro Abortion and pro Criminal, does that mean that you place an incarcerated murderers life, as being more important than the life of an innocent fetus?

@ZeusAres42 ;

Same question, Are you pro Abortion and pro Criminal?

And if you are pro Abortion and pro Criminal, does that mean that you place an incarcerated murderers life, as being more important than the life of an innocent fetus? 

Abortion is anti Life, anti Family, anti Child, anti Community, and anti Humanity.

Just as Murder, is anti Life, anti Child, anti Family, anti Community, and anti Humanity.


@Dee, and @ZeusAres42 ;

Thus I'm pro Life, pro Adoption, pro Child, pro Community, and pro Humanity.

@ZeusAres42

Here's what your overall response was to those very same questions that you refuse to answer still?

"Wow. You got all that just by me saying you cannot be pro-life and support the death penalty at the same time? Really? Wow!"

@ZeusAres42

So you can keep playing your Atheist avoidance game, with your other avoidance answer?

"If you think I said anything which was like bullying then please don't decide to actually get a job in either politics or science. If you cannot handle what I said, then you will literally fall apart in these professions where questions and criticisms to some may come across as brutal. But the difference between them and you is that they all welcome this. Well, perhaps more the scientists than the politician's haha. It's how we learn."

@ZeusAres42

You have an Atheist avoidance issue, with refusing to answer some of the questions asked in your direction, don't you @ZeusAres42?

Because apparently, you like to be in charge of a debate, or a conversation don't you?

"@mannyfritz18 I did no such thing. @TKDB has a habit of putting words into people's mouths, both theists as well as atheists. I understand this is early days for you but soon enough you will find this out for yourself."

You still haven't answered the below questions, why is that?

"Do you support the Death Penalty, Euthanasia, etc? Or are you actually really pro-life at all?"

Are you here to bully people with your own spin on how you look at the pro Life conversation?


@ZeusAres42

Are trying to tell me, others how to think?

"@TKDB it really is quite simple. If you are against abortion because you support life then you cannot say that you support the death penalty as that is the very act of taking away a life also.  If you say you are pro life except in cases of the death penalty this is nothing more than a fallacy of special pleading. You're either pro Life which means support for all life or you're not."

Because an abortion, is no different from the Death Penalty, is it?

But here you are, trying to tell people, that their thinking is a fallacy, because they're not seeing things according to the words coming out of your own mouth right?

How does a fetus deserve to be aborted because two consensual adults were too lazy to use contraceptives, before being intimate?

Is an incarcerated prisoners life, more important than an unborn babies life is, ZeusAres42, because that question should be easy to answer right?

@ZeusAres42 ;
Rape is a fallacy, isn't it?
Sexual assault is a fallacy, isn't it?
Abortion is a fallacy, isn't it?

@ZeusAres42 ;
Are you pro incarcerated prisoner?

Are you pro Abortion?

Are you pro family, or are you pro criminal, and pro offender? 
(Because if you're pro criminal, and offender, then how can you be pro family at the same time?)


@ZeusAres42

Because if you're pro incarcerated prisoner, and pro criminal, and pro offender, while being pro Abortion at the same time, then the rhetoric that you've been shoveling in my direction, makes sense.  

@ZeusAres42

Show me, by copying and pasting, where I CONCEDED anything to you?



"Well, this basically answers my question."

"I will take your response as an admission that you don't have an argument that is devoid of wild and nonsensical theories about the person behind the posts as opposed to an actual argument that focuses on the truth, validity, and the facts of what has been stated regardless of who the person is or what you think about them."

"Thanks for conceding."

@ZeusAres42

Why not debate in a Fair and Equal way?

@ZeusAres42, And you can say whatever you want, BUT, I noticed how you didn't DENY, and of the below questions, that were directed in your direction?


@ZeusAres42


You're from the United Kingdom, and you've been trying to have your Atheist brainwashing way with me, since you began your internet enabled Atheist tutorial, long before I came into the view of your ideological focus.

So please continue on with your Atheist brainwashing ways, because you can't help yourself?

If you weren't so interested, you wouldn't have utilized the mental energy that you used, to respond with your carefully worded counter argument stance?

"@TKDB I am not interested in an argument about the people and what you think about their minds. I want to know what you have to say about what has actually been said? Have you got anything or not? If not, then I am not interested."

@ZeusAres42

You like to be in control of the conversation, don't you?

It's very evident, again because you can't help, but to debate through the guise of your own perception, right?

Otherwise again, why waste time on your below response?

"@TKDB I am not interested in an argument about the people and what you think about their minds.
I want to know what you have to say about what has actually been said?
Have you got anything or not? If not, then I am not interested?"


@ZeusAres42, should I move up to the front of your class, so that I can get some extra credit, from your next teaching moment?


 "Atheist logic: You don't need religion to have morals - you lack empathy?"

@ZeusAres42,
What is your definition of Atheist empathy?