It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
"This can’t be proven in a court of law it is a lie."
"A person cannot prove establish beyond reasonable doubt that recreationally legalizing marijuana can do anything, it is already recreational legal in all states in the United States of America. Once in a Court all people are bound by truth and whole truth by affirmation."
"You are asking a person to give testimony to the abuses of taxation and prove perjury which are outside the limited issue of establishing a united state in written legislation of law with marijuana. As it pertains to substance abuse and the details in basic principle that highlight the abuse as a criminal intent on a public. I feel as though you are asking me to participate in an obstruction of justice by doing so without a written declaration of common defense to the general welfare."
"A benefit to moving the regulation of marijuana from narcotic to air pollution is the following, an alignment in united state constitutional legal precedent. In truth the idea is not stopping an independent substance abuse like THC. It is focusing on the danger to the general welfare by exposer to an abuse as the independent violation occurs. In all ways the danger exists as narcotic."
"Using a legislation of law as alibi to let exposing people to danger knowing through chemical contamination is negligence. The narcotic in marijuana is placed there outside the end users control and often without their knowledge."
You're calling my argument a lie, because my point of view can't be disproven?
Who's lying then, to the public as a whole, when it comes to the United States then?
Maybe those states, that have legalized recreational marijuana, to benefit off of the drug use of the marijuana users use, and the marijuana addicts drug abuse?
Did they maybe lie?
Did some of the marijuana industry (IE, some of the pro marijuana activists, and advocates maybe lie to the citizens in those same states, to help get recreational marijuana legalized?
Did they maybe lie?
The Polls that were created to help push the liberal toleration of the marijuana user's, and the marijuana addicts drug use, unto the rest of the public that doesn't use recreational weed, like the marijuana user's do, day in, and day out?
Did those polls lie to the public, via their carefully crafted, pro marijuana selling points?
Did they maybe lie?
Or maybe the rest of those states, who haven't legalized recreational marijuana to suit the needs of the marijuana user, and the marijuana addicts, are those respective representatives of those non legalization states, are they lying to the public, or the constituents, by not pandering to the marijuana user's, by not legalizing recreational weed?
Did they maybe lie?
You have a host of individuals to choose from above?
So according to your individual pro marijuana ideological mindset, who's lying, in your estimation?