You just proved that your opinion, is self served, by using "ME" to push your individual rhetoric, right?
"@TKDB if you support the death penalty then you cannot be pro life as that is a logical inconsistency.
You cannot justify being prolife in the abortion case and then say you are fine with the taking away of life in the death penalty or any other cases that involve taking away a life. Because then it is no longer a case of being pro-life.
Your post pretty much proves my point about morality conflation regarding the abortion debate."
I will always place Adoption, Kids, Family, Community, and Humanity above your apparent pro criminal, pro offender, and your anti Death Penalty attitudes?
Because there isn't a rapist, shooter, or killer, who is incarcerated in jail, that can claim that they are pro life, can they?
But you'll judge my argument, and you'll give those criminals, and offenders, an apparent pass?
Because going after my argument, is easier than asking a prisoner who is in jail for rape, murder, and their other crimes right?
"You cannot justify being prolife in the abortion case and then say you are fine with the taking away of life in the death penalty or any other cases that involve taking away a life. Because then it is no longer a case of being pro-life."
IE the gun violence crimes, abortion, rape, murder, sexual assaults, drive by shootings, domestic violence, and so on.
***The evidence is clear on what has occurred historically, versus theoretically.
"Indeed, and yet you think we should go back to that."
Here's what happened:
The use of Atheist privilege, and Theist privilege:
(Because the Atheists, and the Theists used the SCOTUS, to in a sense to deprive, the Religious individuals in the United States, from the Right to say a harmless prayer anywhere they choose to, as the behest of the Atheists, and Theists groups in the U.S., and that's the factual TRUTH, since 1962.)
IE "Religious privilege has been taken away, not religious freedom."
(Your premier point: Better hope opposing sects of Christianity in such a privileged position never use the power of government to advance their religious views at the expense of your own." )
"If you had ever been a religious minority, you would understand clearly the danger of mixing religion and government."
We don't have to, you proved that your Theory is but a fictional hypothesis, while history speaks for itself in reality.
Maybe what you mean, is that the Theist Privileges and Rights were amplified, while the Religious individuals, had their Privileges and Rights, in a sense, were diminished, to do what?
Hearing or witnessing a harmless prayer, being said around anyone, and causing zero harm to anyone, at the same time.
No they aren't, your values are no where near mine.
My United States Christian values: I'm pro Adoption, pro Baby, pro Child pro Family, pro Community, pro Religious Freedom, pro Adoption, pro peaceful Atheist, pro Pure Science, pro legal U.S. citizen, and I reject the separation of church and state.
"My values are likely very similar to yours, except I don't give credit or blame to some other being."
Abortion is inappropriate, terrorism is inappropriate, adults killing adults with guns is inappropriate, and two adults creating an unwanted fetus is inappropriate.
Are better examples of the inappropriate actions of others.
And again your unicorn rhetoric, is off topic.
"The analogy of a-unicornism is appropriate since my non-belief in unicorns has nothing to do with my values just like my non-belief in your deity."