frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Badges




User Profile Background Picture

TKDB
Member, joined August 2018



694 Points    17 Badges     76 Debates     3644 Arguments    

0 Followers0 Following0 Friends (Mutual Followers)


O.D.S.L.
Overall Debating Skill Level

O.D.S.L.: 1310 points | Formal And Formalish Debate Wins: 0/1 | Formal And Formalish Debate Losses: 1/1

About

Username
TKDB
Joined
Visits
5,214
Last Active
Roles
Member
Points
694
17
Badges
  • The U.S.A should cut miliary spending

    Military spending isn't just for the military exclusively, its for the military families, and the veterans as well.
    The veterans clinics, and the veterans hospitals across the country.
    Commissaries, medical and dental clinics, as well, that take care of the soldiers, and the families also, along with housing. 


    Zombieguy1987
  • The U.S.A should cut miliary spending

    @Zombieguy1987

    "I feel the U.S government should cut military spending, prove me otherwise."

    Do you know anything about military spending?

    Do you know anything about the infrastructure involved with the military?

    Do you know how much funding it takes to feed the United States military abroud? 

    Do you know how much it takes to clothe, provide medical care, for the active military, and the veterans who have already severved in the US military? 
    Zombieguy1987
  • I want to vote for President Trump when he runs for re-election, can you change my mind?

    @Zombieguy1987

    I'm still waiting to see, and or hear about a court case, where religion is found guilty of a crime, along with the criminal being found guilty of the same crime, along with the offender.

    I wonder when someone from the anti religious crowd, might file a lawsuit, to protest these words?

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Six_of_the_United_States_Constitution#Oaths

    "I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. [So help me God.]"


    Zombieguy1987
  • Who won the Government shutdown?

    https://www-realclearpolitics-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/01/31/schumer_wields_leverage_and_a_flip_phone_against_trump_139333.amp.html?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCCAE=#referrer=https://www.google.com&amp_tf=From %1$s&ampshare=https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/01/31/schumer_wields_leverage_and_a_flip_phone_against_trump_139333.html

    Schumer Wields Leverage and a Flip Phone Against Trump

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House plan for peeling off Democrats to support President Donald Trump’s demands for billions in border wall money ran into a particularly stubborn obstacle: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s flip phone.

    Schumer had already been talking with his colleagues for months, anticipating Trump’s fight long before the shutdown battle began. Soon after the midterm elections in early November, the New Yorker started doing what he does best, talking to his senators.

    One by one, he dialed them on his vintage flip phone to gauge support for spending money on the wall with Mexico. He made a beeline for them across the Senate floor. He cornered them in the Senate gym. Most Democrats told him they were against it.

    That unity buoyed Democrats during the just-concluded shutdown saga and is now girding them for the next round, with a second federal closure threatened by the White House.

    While Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., seized the starring role against Trump’s border wall, Schumer played no small part by helping shore up his side of the Capitol and bolstering Pelosi’s position.

    It’s a strategy the Democrats will rely on as the next shutdown deadline, Feb. 15, nears, and as Senate Democrats use their minority status as leverage to align with Pelosi’s House majority on various fronts.

    “If anything, our unity is stronger today than it was,” Schumer said Tuesday.

    It was his most high-profile role since taking on the leader’s position in 2017.

    During Trump’s first two years, Senate Democrats held together to vote against the Republican tax plan, resulting in a partisan measure that has failed to gain widespread popular appeal. Democrats also denied Republicans the votes needed to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, after dissent from the GOP ranks left Republicans without enough support.

    Schumer has been praised, but also criticized, for not forcing his senators to fall in line the way past leaders have done. Liberals railed against him for failing to stop Brett Kavanaugh from being confirmed to the Supreme Court, even though only one Democrat voted for Trump’s nominee.

    Schumer is proving to be a different kind of leader, nudging his caucus to hold together on big fights, but also cutting senators loose to vote as they wish at other times.

    Last year, Schumer looked the other way as several Democrats supported a Republican banking bill that reversed some Democratic changes put in place after the Great Recession. This month, as soon as the shutdown ended, Schumer lifted the blockade on a GOP foreign policy bill supporting Israel that divided Democrats; their votes allowed it to easily advance.

    Schumer is showing the strength that Senate Democrats can assert in the chamber where 60 votes are usually needed to advance legislation to support or thwart Trump’s agenda.

    Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., a member of the leadership team, said Schumer has “an uncanny way to be able to listen” to the various views and end up with a position that “eventually everybody can feel OK with.”

    Days after the Nov. 6 election when Democrats suffered defeats in the Senate, Schumer started dialing up Democrats about the border wall. Four colleagues from states where Trump is popular lost their elections. But without much prodding, senators were lining up against giving Trump the money he wanted, according to a senior Democratic aide who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe private conversations.

    Senators had approved a border security package and saw no reason to spend more. Plus, Democrats had just won the House, strengthening their hand. By the time the White House thought about flipping Democrats, it was too late.

    “It’s old the minds and hearts thing,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. Schumer, he said, “knows the minds and hearts of his colleagues.”

    Even in Virginia, where Sen. Tim Kaine represents thousands of federal workers who would eventually go without pay during the record 35-day shutdown, Democrats held firm.

    “The issue that the president chose to battle on, he just picked an issue where every Democrat is completely unified,” Kaine said. “Our caucus just welded together.”

    In the end, just one Democrat, Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, voted for the wall money. The White House didn’t even bother trying to call another potential Democratic vote, Sen. Doug Jones of Alabama.

    Emboldened by their newfound leverage, Democrats are now looking at areas where they can unite against some policies and perhaps win some GOP support on issues such as prescription drug prices, administration oversight or protecting special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

    The night before a pivotal White House meeting in December, when the shutdown was a possibility but not yet reality, Schumer and Pelosi discussed strategy. They couldn’t have imagined what would come next.

    With the television cameras rolling the next day at the White House, Trump said in an exchange with Schumer that he would “take the mantle” and own the shutdown. Schumer can be seen trying to hold back a smile.

    A short while later Schumer arrived back at the Capitol for a private lunch with Democratic senators. They, too, were stunned.

    The shutdown would drag for more than a month, but for Senate Democrats the new Congress was just beginning.

    “It reinforced a lot of our steadfastness and resolve,” said Blumenthal, and “trust in our values and in the American people to see through Trump’s bullying and bluster.”

    Could it be that Schumer, similarly uses his political management skills just as Pelosi possibly does? 

    Zombieguy1987whiteflame
  • Who won the Government shutdown?

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/pelosi-no-wall-money-u-border-deal-talks-162509707--business.html

    Some excerpts from the article:

    "Speaker Pelosi: No wall money in U.S. border deal talks"


    "There's not going to be any wall money in the legislation," the top House Democrat told reporters, adding that more ports of entry or additional border technology was on the table for negotiation.

    "Asked by reporters about Pelosi's comment on wall funding, Trump said: "Without a wall, it doesn’t work."

    The committee of Republican and Democratic representatives and senators met for the first time on Wednesday to begin negotiating a compromise on federal spending. Trump has demanded a $5.7 billion down payment for his promised wall.

    The committee will likely have to wrap up its work around Feb. 10 to meet a Feb. 15 deadline set when Trump and lawmakers agreed last week to end a 35-day partial government shutdown, the longest in U.S. history. Otherwise, about 800,000 federal employees could again be furloughed or forced to work without pay.

    Pelosi rejected as a "nonstarter" Trump's offer of a temporary three-year protection for "Dreamer" immigrants in exchange for a permanent wall. The Dreamers are young people brought illegally to the United States as children.

    The speaker also said she does not believe a bill to permanently end shutdowns should be part of current border security negotiations.

    House Democrats on Thursday released to reporters a detailed summary of their opening offer in the negotiations. It did not include money for a wall or any type of new physical border barriers.

    Democrats proposed giving Customs and Border Protection $98 million above last year for hiring 1,000 more customs agents, as well as $400 million for buying and deploying security technology, which would be $353 million above Trump's request, according to a summary provided by the House Appropriations Committee.

    Democrats also would put new constraints on the ability of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to place in deportation proceedings the sponsors of undocumented immigrant minors who are in the United States without their parents.

    Pelosi criticized a series of Thursday morning tweets in which Trump said the negotiators were "wasting their time" and he would build the wall on his own. The president has said he would consider declaring a national emergency in order to divert existing funds to build a wall, which would almost certainly trigger a court challenge. By law, Congress appropriates the money for federal projects.

    "I’ve got you covered. Wall is already being built, I don’t expect much help!" Trump wrote.

    Pelosi said Trump would prefer Congress to be "completely irrelevant" in the negotiations.

    "It is not a negotiation for the president to say ... 'it doesn't matter what Congress says'," she said at a news conference."

    The lone plus in regards to Pelosi, she gets to be the Speaker Of The House, for 4 years only.



    Zombieguy1987whiteflame

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
© 2023 DebateIsland.com, all rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch