"The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."
What if there isn't another citizen, with a gun to stop a criminal, or an offender, with a gun?
Does that maybe, make those victims irrelevant in regards to your pro gun question?
Does that make the Bill of Rights an irrelevant document, in the face of the Second Amendment itself?
Because there are more guns, in this country then there are innocent victims, and the police?
393 million guns, verses 325 million U.S. citizens, and 900,000 Police Officers?
Isn't a gun violence committed crime, by a first time offender, an offender, or criminal in general, are cruel and unusual punishments, towards their innocent victim, or victims?
Where is the fair and equal moment, in your unequal and unfair question?
The United States has a gun problem, and the serial killers, sociopaths, criminals, offenders, first time offenders, and those illegal immigrants, or aliens, who used a gun to kill their innocent victims with, don't care about the United States, having a gun problem.
But do you know how to fix the gun problem in the United States?
(You can't throw the law at them, because people kill people with guns every day.)
Because those innocent babies, toddlers, kids, children, and families, made victims of themselves because they weren't armed with a gun like those offenders had, to shoot those offenders with, prior to being murdered by those same offenders right?
You throw the Second Amendment at those same offenders, and you let the Second Amendment deal with those murdered innocent lives, right?
Treat the Second Amendment as if it were it's own Police Officer, DA, and Judge, and let the Second Amendment, do it's lawful duty, right pro gun extremists crowd?
Each President, is responsible for the country as a whole.
And each President's legacy, via their time in the Oval Office, is going to speak for itself.
Their individual political philosophies, are a barometer for how they affected the country.
And the individual actions, of the rest of the political representatives, outside of the Oval Office, via their individual political philosophies, and how they as well, affect the rest of the country, is it's own barometer.
"The best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."
What if there isn't another citizen, with a gun to stop a criminal, or an offender, with a gun?
Does that maybe, make those victims irrelevant in regards to your pro gun question?
Does that make the Bill of Rights an irrelevant document, in the face of the Second Amendment itself?
Because there are more guns, in this country then there are innocent victims, and the police?
393 million guns, verses 325 million U.S. citizens, and 900,000 Police Officers?
Isn't a gun violence committed crime, by a first time offender, an offender, or criminal in general, are cruel and unusual punishments, towards their innocent victim, or victims?
Where is the fair and equal moment, in your unequal and unfair question?
The problem with the homework conversation, in the current day and age via the current generation is that the amount of time, spent on social media, video games, and the internet in general, is being allowed to interfere with the modern students educational time, or IE studying and doing ones homework, as responsibly as possible, just as the generations before this one did?
Before the internet, and social media, along with the learned exposure of video games from the one generation to the next continue to be allowed to basically place ones educational responsibilities in the backseat of one's priorities, and by making their casual internet use, and their social media interactions, get to sit in the front seat, of their prioritized priorities?
With some watching their education chances, fading into the rearview mirror, or their current lives, as they drive into their futures, with the internet, the video games, and their social media wants intact, because they neglected their own homework choices?