@Plaffelvohfen

Keep going, you've yet to fail to continue to keep pushing, your pro marijuana rhetoric with each additional response.

You are just as chronic, with your rhetoric, as some of the other pro marijuana supporters are, with their own pro marijuana, rhetoric stances? 

The more that a pro marijuana supporter, explains their individual stances, the public becomes continuesly educated, on the mindsets of some of the defense strategies, utilized by some, of the pro marijuana individuals, to in a sense, defend the recreational marijuana user's themselves?

Please Plaffelvohfen, continue to educate, the public more? 

Eventually the public in general, is going to catch on, to how the legalization of recreational marijuana, really works, and who it's really benefitting, verses who it doesn't benefit?  

Another internet provided chapter, from your very own keyboard, to educate the public with right, Plaffelvohfen? 

You're defending freedom from your individual self declared authority, via your own individual computer?

Yeap, just like the other chronic pro marijuana supporters do, day in, and day out, from behind the anonymity of your name, "Plaffelvohfen?"



"I'm defending freedom from self-declared authority via internet connection and individually auto-proclaimed individual puritan mindset?? "

And I'm still pro unborn baby, and pro family oriented, in the very face of those poorly written, Marijuana Laws?

While you're pro you, and a pro marijuana user supporter?

Now the public, knows our stances. 

@Plaffelvohfen

"You're scared to answer the simple questions?"

I'm defending the unborn babies, and those same families of the marijuana user?

Who, does it appear to be that you are defending, the marijuana user, only? 


Why is it so hard, to talk about a marijuana users drug use around their own kids?

Or, to talk about a pregnant lady, using marijuana while she is pregnant? 

Or just avoid, talking about those unborn baby's rights, or the marijuana user's family rights, outside of their rights?

Those poorly written laws, only legitimize those marijuana user's rights only, don't they? 

While unjustifiably, ignoring the rights of those unborn babies, and the rights of the marijuana user's family?

That, basically amounts to legalized, marijuana user fraud, doesn't it?

But instead you, come back with some more, of your irrelevant pro marijuana word play?

"On another note, did you know that the vast majority of households in the US have no children?? The share of adults living without children has climbed 19 points since 1967 to 71.3%... From the US census bureau... 

So even if I grant you that pregnant woman and mothers could be restricted from using cannabis, how do you justify restrictions for the 71.3% of adult living without children? 

Anything to say about this or will you let your Lovejoy syndrome take over once again?"

You are just as chronic, with your rhetoric, as some of the other pro marijuana supporters are, with their own pro marijuana, rhetoric stances? 

The more that a pro marijuana supporter, explains their individual stances, the public becomes continuesly educated, on the mindsets of some of the defense strategies, utilized by some, of the pro marijuana individuals, to in a sense, defend the recreational marijuana user's themselves?

Please Plaffelvohfen, continue to educate, the public more? 

Eventually the public in general, is going to catch on, to how the legalization of recreational marijuana, really works, and who it's really benefitting, verses who it doesn't benefit? 

@John_C_87

You still have no argument John.

Just your own thought up rhetoric.

Is it safe or unsafe for a lady, to smoke recreational, while she is pregnant? 
(From my understanding, it's unsafe.)

And does the legalization of recreational marijuana, make it legal, for a lady to use recreational marijuana, while being pregnant? 
(No, the law does not make it legal.)

I've read each states Marijuana Laws, and as far as I can tell, it's not legal, for a lady to use recreational marijuana while carrying an unborn baby? 


And for that matter, it's not legal as well, for any recreational marijuana user, to use "Medicinal, or Recreational" marijuana, around their kids, children, or their families either, or the kids, of other peoples families as well either?
(Same answer for this question as well: No, it does not.)

https://www.healthline.com/health/pregnancy/smoking-weed

"Overview

Weed is a drug derived from the plant Cannabis sativa. It’s used for recreational and medicinalpurposes.

What a mom-to-be puts on her skin, eats, and smokes affects her baby. Weed is one substance that can potentially impact a developing baby’s health. "

"What’s the prevalence of weed use in pregnancy?

Weed is the most commonly used illicit drug during pregnancy. Studies have tried to estimate the exact number of pregnant women who use weed, but results vary.

According to the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), 2 to 5 percent of women use weed during pregnancy. This number goes up for certain groups of women. For example, young, urban, and socioeconomically disadvantaged women report higher rates of use that reach up to 28 percent."

"What are the potential effects of using weed while pregnant?

Doctors have linked weed use during pregnancy with increased risk for complications. These may include:

• low birth weight
• premature birth
• small head circumference
• small length
• stillbirth "

Researchers mostly study the effects of weed use during pregnancy on animals. Experts say exposure to THC can affect a baby’s brain developmentTrusted Source.

Babies born to mothers who smoke weed during pregnancy don’t have serious signs of withdrawal. However, other changes may be noted.

Research is ongoing, but a baby whose mother used weed during pregnancy may have problems as they get older. The research isn't clear: Some older research reports no long-term developmental differences, but newer research is showing some problems for these children.

THC is considered a developmental neurotoxin by some. A child whose mother used weed during pregnancy may have trouble with memory, attention, controlling impulses, and school performance. More research is needed. "

The growing popularity of vape pens has led weed users to switch from smoking the drug to “vaping.” Vape pens use water vapor instead of smoke.

Many pregnant women mistakenly think vaping or eating weed doesn’t harm their baby. But these preparations still have THC, the active ingredient. As a result, they can harm a baby. We just don’t know if it’s safe, and therefore is not worth the risk. "

So some, may want to read up on their individual states Marijuana Laws?

Because some might be breaking the very law, that made their recreation marijuana use, to begin with?

Just because something like recreational marijuana, has been legalized, that doesn't mean that the recreational marijuana user, can use the drug, whenever they feel its self appropriate, to do so?

Being that those individual state's Marijuana Laws, do not support, that type of mindset?

Below is Colorado's Marijuana Law, read what it says, verses what it doesn't?

https://www.coloradopotguide.com/marijuana-laws-in-colorado/

@John_C_87 ;

None of those published Marijuana Laws, can be USED by you to properly support, your "Ex Post Facto Law" argument, can they?

Show the PUBLIC, where the words "Ex Post Facto Law" are a published part, of any of those individual states Marijuana Laws? 

That's the difference between your ideology and those published laws, those laws are copyrighted terms, per each states, aren't they?

So unless, you can explicitly show where your argument "Ex Post Facto Law" is a part of the Marijuana Laws, you're basically, in a sense, a street corner preacher, preaching on the internet?

Therefore your argument is a fraudulent argument, based on the workings of your own mind? 

What Post "Ex Post Facto Law" ideology, are you going to conjure up, from your own brain next?